Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug 31:2022:8790748.
doi: 10.1155/2022/8790748. eCollection 2022.

Lack of Association between Epidermal Growth Factor or Its Receptor and Reflux Esophagitis, Barrett's Esophagus, and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: A Case-Control Study

Affiliations

Lack of Association between Epidermal Growth Factor or Its Receptor and Reflux Esophagitis, Barrett's Esophagus, and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: A Case-Control Study

Tereza Deissova et al. Dis Markers. .

Abstract

The epidermal growth factor (EGF) and its receptor (EGFR) gene-gene interactions were shown to increase the susceptibility to esophageal cancer. However, the role of the EGF/EGFR pathway in the development of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and its complications (reflux esophagitis (RE), Barrett's esophagus (BE), and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC)) remains unclear. This association study is aimed at investigating functional EGF and EGFR gene polymorphisms, their mRNA expression in esophageal tissues, and EGF plasma levels in relation to RE, BE, and EAC development in the Central European population. 301 patients with RE/BE/EAC (cases) as well as 98 patients with nonerosive reflux disease (NERD) and 8 healthy individuals (controls) were genotyped for +61 A>G EGF (rs4444903) and +142285 G>A EGFR (rs2227983) polymorphisms using the TaqMan quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). In random subgroups, the EGF and EGFR mRNA expressions were analyzed by reverse transcription qPCR in esophageal tissue with and without endoscopically visible pathological changes; and the EGF plasma levels were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. None of the genotyped SNPs nor EGF-EGFR genotype interactions were associated with RE, BE, or EAC development (p > 0.05). Moreover, mRNA expression of neither EGF nor EGFR differed between samples of the esophageal tissue with and without endoscopically visible pathology (p > 0.05) nor between samples from patients with different diagnoses, i.e., RE, BE, or EAC (p > 0.05). Nevertheless, the lower EGF mRNA expression in carriers of combined genotypes AA +61 EGF (rs4444903) and GG +142285 EGFR (rs2227983; p < 0.05) suggests a possible direct/indirect effect of EGF-EGFR gene interactions on EGF gene expression. In conclusion, EGF and EGFR gene variants and their mRNA/protein expression were not associated with RE, BE or EAC development in the Central European population.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The function of studied polymorphisms based on previous studies; allele A of +61 A>G epidermal growth factor (rs4444903) polymorphism leads to a reduction of EGF mRNA expression, and allele G of +142285 G>A EGF receptor (EGFR, rs2227983) polymorphism increases the activity of EGFR [24, 25].
Figure 2
Figure 2
Violin plots of the differences in mRNA expression of the epidermal growth factor (EGF) and its receptor (EGFR) in the tissues with/without visible pathological changes among patients (n = 23) with reflux esophagitis (RE), Barrett's esophagus (BE) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). p > 0.05 Wilcoxon signed ranked test was used.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Violin plot of epidermal growth factor (EGF) plasma levels in 29 patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), of which 10 suffered from reflux esophagitis (RE), 9 from Barrett's esophagus (BE), and 10 from esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), and 8 were healthy individuals (healthy controls, HC). p > 0.05; Wilcoxon signed ranked test was used.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Violin plots of the differences in mRNA expression of the epidermal growth factor (EGF) and its receptor (EGFR) in the tissues with/without visible pathological changes from patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (n = 23) divided into two groups according to their EGF-EGFR genotypes: +61 A>G EGF (rs4444903) and +142285 EGFR G>A (rs2227983) Kruskal-Wallis or Mann–Whitney tests were used.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Argyrou A., Legaki E., Koutserimpas C., et al. Risk factors for gastroesophageal reflux disease and analysis of genetic contributors. World Journal of Clinical Cases . 2018;6(8):176–182. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v6.i8.176. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Herregods T. V. K., Bredenoord A. J., Smout A. J. P. M. Pathophysiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease: new understanding in a new era. Neurogastroenterology and Motility . 2015;27(9):1202–1213. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12611. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Long J. D., Orlando R. C. Nonerosive reflux disease. Minerva Gastroenterologica e Dietologica . 2007;53(2):127–141. - PubMed
    1. Woodland P., Sifrim D. Esophageal mucosal integrity in nonerosive reflux disease. Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology . 2014;48(1):6–12. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e318299f181. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Marcinkiewicz M., Grabowska S. Z., Czyzewska E. Role of epidermal growth factor (EGF) in oesophageal mucosal integrity. Current Medical Research and Opinion . 1998;14(3):145–153. doi: 10.1185/03007999809113354. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

Supplementary concepts