Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May:2022:5528-5532.
doi: 10.1109/icassp43922.2022.9746382. Epub 2022 Apr 27.

SCATTERING STATISTICS OF GENERALIZED SPATIAL POISSON POINT PROCESSES

Affiliations

SCATTERING STATISTICS OF GENERALIZED SPATIAL POISSON POINT PROCESSES

Michael Perlmutter et al. Proc IEEE Int Conf Acoust Speech Signal Process. 2022 May.

Abstract

We present a machine learning model for the analysis of randomly generated discrete signals, modeled as the points of an inhomogeneous, compound Poisson point process. Like the wavelet scattering transform introduced by Mallat, our construction is naturally invariant to translations and reflections, but it decouples the roles of scale and frequency, replacing wavelets with Gabor-type measurements. We show that, with suitable nonlinearities, our measurements distinguish Poisson point processes from common self-similar processes, and separate different types of Poisson point processes.

Keywords: Poisson point process; Scattering transform; convolutional neural network.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
First-order invariant scattering moments of homogeneous compound Poisson point processes with the same intensity λ0 and different Ai. Left: Realizations of the process with arrival rates given by Top: Ai = 1 Middle: Ai are normal random variables Bottom: Ai are Rademacher random variables. Middle: Plots of normalized first-order scattering SY(s,ξ,1)sw1 moments with p = 1.Right: Plots of normalized first-order scattering SY(s,ξ,2)sw22 moments with p = 2.
Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
First-order invariant scattering moments of homogeneous compound Poisson point processes with the same intensity λ0 and different Ai. Left: Realizations of the process with arrival rates given by Top: Ai = 1 Middle: Ai are normal random variables Bottom: Ai are Rademacher random variables. Middle: Plots of normalized first-order scattering SY(s,ξ,1)sw1 moments with p = 1.Right: Plots of normalized first-order scattering SY(s,ξ,2)sw22 moments with p = 2.
Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
First-order invariant scattering moments of homogeneous compound Poisson point processes with the same intensity λ0 and different Ai. Left: Realizations of the process with arrival rates given by Top: Ai = 1 Middle: Ai are normal random variables Bottom: Ai are Rademacher random variables. Middle: Plots of normalized first-order scattering SY(s,ξ,1)sw1 moments with p = 1.Right: Plots of normalized first-order scattering SY(s,ξ,2)sw22 moments with p = 2.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
First-order scattering moments for inhomogeneous Poisson point processes. Left: Sample realization with λ(t)=0.011+0.5sin2πtN. Right: Time-dependent scattering moments Sγ,pY(t)swPp at t1=N4, t2=N2,t3=3N4. Note that the scattering coefficients at times t1, t2, t3 converges to λ(t1) = 0.015, λ(t2) = 0.01, λ(t3) = 0.005.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
First-order scattering moments for inhomogeneous Poisson point processes. Left: Sample realization with λ(t)=0.011+0.5sin2πtN. Right: Time-dependent scattering moments Sγ,pY(t)swPp at t1=N4, t2=N2,t3=3N4. Note that the scattering coefficients at times t1, t2, t3 converges to λ(t1) = 0.015, λ(t2) = 0.01, λ(t3) = 0.005.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
First-order invariant scattering moments for standard Brownian motion and Poisson point process. Left: Sample realizations Top: Brownian motion. Bottom: Ordinary Poisson point process. Middle: Normalized scattering moments SYpoisson(x,ξ,p)λEA1pwpp and SXBM(s,ξ,p)λE|Z|pwpp for Poisson and BM with p = 1. Right: The same but with p = 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
First-order invariant scattering moments for standard Brownian motion and Poisson point process. Left: Sample realizations Top: Brownian motion. Bottom: Ordinary Poisson point process. Middle: Normalized scattering moments SYpoisson(x,ξ,p)λEA1pwpp and SXBM(s,ξ,p)λE|Z|pwpp for Poisson and BM with p = 1. Right: The same but with p = 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
First-order invariant scattering moments for standard Brownian motion and Poisson point process. Left: Sample realizations Top: Brownian motion. Bottom: Ordinary Poisson point process. Middle: Normalized scattering moments SYpoisson(x,ξ,p)λEA1pwpp and SXBM(s,ξ,p)λE|Z|pwpp for Poisson and BM with p = 1. Right: The same but with p = 2.
None

References

    1. Sifre Laurent and Mallat Stéphane, “Rotation, scaling and deformation invariant scattering for texture discrimination,” in The IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), June 2013.
    1. Gatys Leon, Ecker Alexander S, and Matthias Bethge, “Texture synthesis using convolutional neural networks,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 28, 2015, pp. 262–270.
    1. Antognini Joseph, Hoffman Matt, and Weiss Ron J., “Synthesizing diverse, high-quality audio textures,” arXiv:1806.08002, 2018.
    1. Binkowski Mikolaj, Marti Gautier, and Donnat Philippe, “Autoregressive convolutional neural networks for asynchronous time series,” in Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Machine Learning, Jennifer Dy and Andreas Krause, Eds., Stockholmsmässan, Stockholm Sweden, 10–15 Jul 2018, vol. 80 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, pp. 580–589, PMLR.
    1. Brochard Antoine, Bartłomiej Błaszczyszyn, Stéphane Mallat, and Zhang Sixin, “Statistical learning of geometric characteristics of wireless networks,” arXiv:1812.08265, 2018.

LinkOut - more resources