Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022;73(4):1189-1202.
doi: 10.3233/WOR-205233.

Return to work of employees with low levels of education: The employers' role and perspective

Nicole Hoefsmit  1 , Inge Houkes  2
Affiliations

Return to work of employees with low levels of education: The employers' role and perspective

Nicole Hoefsmit et al. Work. 2022.

Abstract

Background: To achieve adequate return to work (RTW) after sickness absence, Dutch legislation prescribes cooperation between absent employees and employers. Yet, we lack insight into how employees with low levels of education exercise influence over (i.e. self-direct) RTW.

Objective: This study aimed to enhance our understanding of: (A) the role that employers play in the self-direction of employees with low levels of education over their RTW; (B) how employers perceive these employees' efforts (or lack thereof) to self-direct their own RTW; and (C) how employers understand and interpret the behaviours of these employees. Social cognitive theory served as a framework.

Methods: A qualitative study was conducted with 13 employer representatives using semi-structured interviews. Data were analysed in NVivo12 using a template approach.

Results: Employers tend to play a guiding, directive role in employees' RTW. According to employers, employees generally comply with the employers' decisions and suggestions, whether or not they have tried to realise their own preferences regarding mode and timing of RTW. Employers interpret such employee behaviours from the perspective of environmental (e.g. financial pressures to RTW) and person-related factors (e.g. sickness and RTW perceptions).

Conclusions: Employers, rather than employees direct the employees' RTW. Employers should give voice to employees and enable them to have more control over their RTW. Future research should acquire more insight in the employees' perspective.

Keywords: Return to work; employees with low levels of education; employers; self-direction; sick leave; sickness absence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Overview of study aim B within the framework provided by the social cognitive model (adapted from [24]). Note. The elements displayed in black belong to the theoretical basis of this study. Also, the figure contains dashed arrows as we are interested in the participants’ perceptions of the factors that are underlying behaviour, rather than in causal relationships.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Overview of the main results regarding study aim B.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Waddell G, Burton AK. Is work good for your health and well-being? London: TSO; 2006.
    1. Black C. Working for a healthier tomorrow. London: TSO; 2008.
    1. Smeets J, Hoefsmit N, Houkes I. Self-directing return-to-work: An employees’ perspective. WORK. 2019;64(4):797–807. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hoefsmit N, de Rijk A, Houkes I. Work resumption at the price of distrust: A qualitative study on return to work legislation in the Netherlands. BMC Public Health. 2013. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-153. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hoefsmit N, Boumans NPG, Houkes I. Eigen regie over werkhervatting door verzuimende werknemers (Self-direction by employees in return-to-work). Gedrag & Organisatie. 2019;32(2):71–85.

LinkOut - more resources