Physicians' perspectives on using a patient decision aid in female stress urinary incontinence
- PMID: 36094623
- PMCID: PMC10238298
- DOI: 10.1007/s00192-022-05344-w
Physicians' perspectives on using a patient decision aid in female stress urinary incontinence
Abstract
Introduction and hypothesis: A treatment choice for female stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is preference sensitive for both patients and physicians. Multiple treatment options are available, with none being superior to any other. The decision-making process can be supported by a patient decision aid (PDA). We aimed to assess physicians' perceptions concerning the use of a PDA.
Methods: In a mixed methods study, urologists, gynecologists and general practitioners in the Netherlands were asked to fill out a web-based questionnaire. Questions were based on the Tailored Implementation for Chronic Diseases checklist using the following domains: guideline factors, individual health professional factors, professional interactions, incentives and resources, and capacity for organizational change. Participants were asked to grade statements using a five-point Likert scale and to answer open questions on facilitators of and barriers to implementation of a PDA. Outcomes of statement rating were quantitatively analyzed and thematic analysis was performed on the outcomes regarding facilitators and barriers.
Results: The response rate was 11%, with a total of 120 participants completing the questionnaire. Ninety-two of the physicians (77%) would use a PDA in female SUI. Evidence-based and unbiased content, the ability to support shared decision making, and patient empowerment are identified as main facilitators. Barriers are the expected prolonged time investment and the possible difficulty using the PDA in less health-literate patient populations.
Conclusions: The majority of physicians would use a PDA for female SUI. We identified facilitators and barriers that can be used when developing and implementing such a PDA.
Keywords: Barriers; Facilitators; Patient decision aid; Physician; Shared decision making; Stress urinary incontinence.
© 2022. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Kirsten Kluivers and Maria Gerritse received a grant for the development of a female SUI patient decision aid, ZonMw: project number 1708823021. The other authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
The views of women and their physicians on decision-making for stress urinary incontinence.World J Urol. 2025 May 26;43(1):329. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05668-4. World J Urol. 2025. PMID: 40419779 Free PMC article.
-
Supporting the Choice for Conservative and Surgical Treatment in Female Stress Urinary Incontinence: Development and Evaluation of a Patient Decision Aid.Neurourol Urodyn. 2024 Nov;43(8):2052-2059. doi: 10.1002/nau.25578. Epub 2024 Sep 5. Neurourol Urodyn. 2024. PMID: 39234766
-
Utility of patient decision aids (PDA) in stress urinary incontinence surgery.Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Sep;30(9):1483-1486. doi: 10.1007/s00192-019-03982-1. Epub 2019 Jun 1. Int Urogynecol J. 2019. PMID: 31154467 Free PMC article.
-
Dutch guidelines for physiotherapy in patients with stress urinary incontinence: an update.Int Urogynecol J. 2014 Feb;25(2):171-9. doi: 10.1007/s00192-013-2219-3. Epub 2013 Oct 1. Int Urogynecol J. 2014. PMID: 24081496 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Do we need better information to advise women with stress incontinence on their choice of surgery? Report from the ICI-RS 2018.Neurourol Urodyn. 2019 Dec;38 Suppl 5:S98-S103. doi: 10.1002/nau.24020. Neurourol Urodyn. 2019. PMID: 31821636 Review.
Cited by
-
Do We Have Sufficient Evidence to Derive Innovative Approaches to Assessing Unmet Need, Delivering Education on Bladder and Bowel Continence Health, and Providing a Better Environment for Joint Decision-Making? ICI-RS 2024.Neurourol Urodyn. 2025 Mar;44(3):644-650. doi: 10.1002/nau.25654. Epub 2025 Jan 13. Neurourol Urodyn. 2025. PMID: 39803866 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Dutch guideline Urinary incontinence for 2nd and 3rd line care. 2014. https://richtlijnendatabase.nl/richtlijn/urine-incontinentie_ui_2e-_en_3...
-
- Dutch guideline GPs Urinary incontinence in women. 2015. https://richtlijnen.nhg.org/standaarden/incontinentie-voor-urine-bij-vro....
-
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence: Guidelines. Urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse in women: management. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng123/resources/urinary-incontinence-an.... - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical