Socially assistive robotics and older family caregivers of young adults with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (IDD): A pilot study exploring respite, acceptance, and usefulness
- PMID: 36095027
- PMCID: PMC9467313
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273479
Socially assistive robotics and older family caregivers of young adults with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (IDD): A pilot study exploring respite, acceptance, and usefulness
Abstract
Introduction: The need for caregiver respite is well-documented for the care of persons with IDD. Social Assistive Robotics (SAR) offer promise in addressing the need for caregiver respite through 'complementary caregiving' activities that promote engagement and learning opportunities for a care recipient (CR) with IDD. This study explored the acceptability and usefulness of a SAR caregiver respite program responsive to feedback from both young adults with IDD and their older family caregivers (age 55+).
Method: Young adults with IDD and caregiver dyads (N = 11) were recruited. A mixed methods research design was deployed in three phases: Phase I with four focus groups to inform the program design; Phase II for program demonstration and evaluation with pre- and post-surveys; and Phase III with post-program interviews for feedback and suggestions.
Results: Both young adults with IDD and their caregivers scored favorably the social presence of, social engagement, and satisfaction with robot Pepper. Though there was no significant improvement of caregiving burden/stress as well as well-being of the young adults with IDD based on surveys, results from interviews suggested that the SAR may offer physical/emotional respite to caregivers by providing companionship/friendship as well as promoting independence, safety/monitoring, and interactive engagement with children.
Discussion: SAR has potential in providing respite for older family caregivers. Future studies need a longer program design and larger sample size to develop a promising intervention and test its feasibility and efficacy.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures
References
-
- Erickson W, Lee C, Von Schrader S. Disability Status Report: United States. Ithaca, NY:Cornell University Yang-Tan Institute on Employment and Disability (YTI).
-
- Stoddard S. 2014 Disability Statistics Annual Report. A Publication of the Disability Statistics & Demographics Rehabilitation Research & Training Center. Institute on Disability, University of New Hampshire. 2014.
-
- Coughlin J. Estimating the impact of caregiving and employment on well-being. Center for Health Research, Healthways, Incorporated; 2010.
-
- Alliance FC. Caregiver statistics: demographics. 2016.
-
- Lunsky Y, Robinson S, Blinkhorn A, Ouellette-Kuntz H. Parents of adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) and compound caregiving responsibilities. Journal of child and family Studies. 2017. May 1;26(5):1374–9.