6 Ethical Implications of Neurobiologically Informed Risk Assessment for Criminal Justice Decisions: A Case for Pragmatism
- PMID: 36095110
- Bookshelf ID: NBK583716
6 Ethical Implications of Neurobiologically Informed Risk Assessment for Criminal Justice Decisions: A Case for Pragmatism
© 2022 Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Sections
References
-
- Aharoni E., Anderson N. E., Barnes J. C., Allen C. H., Kiehl K. A. Mind the gap: Toward an integrative science of the brain and crime. BioSocieties. 2019;14(3):463–468.
-
- Andrews D. A. Enhancing adherence to risk–need–responsivity: Making quality a matter of policy. Criminology and Public Policy. 2006;5(3):595–602.
-
- Aos S., Miller M., Drake E. Evidence-based public policy options to reduce future prison construction, criminal justice costs, and crime rates. Federal Sentencing Reporter. 2006;19(4):275.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources