Molecular point-of-care testing for lower respiratory tract pathogens improves safe antibiotic de-escalation in patients with pneumonia in the ICU: Results of a randomised controlled trial
- PMID: 36096312
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2022.09.003
Molecular point-of-care testing for lower respiratory tract pathogens improves safe antibiotic de-escalation in patients with pneumonia in the ICU: Results of a randomised controlled trial
Abstract
Background: Effective treatment of pneumonia requires timely administration of appropriate antimicrobials but standard diagnostic tests take around 48 h to generate results. Highly accurate, rapid molecular tests have been developed for identifying organisms in lower respiratory tract samples, however their impact on antibiotic use is unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of syndromic molecular point-of-care testing compared to conventional diagnostic testing, on antibiotic use.
Methods: In this pragmatic, randomised controlled trial, we enrolled critically ill adults with pneumonia. Patients were assigned (1:1) to molecular testing of samples at the point-of-care or routine clinical care. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who received results-directed antimicrobial therapy.
Results: 200 patients were randomly assigned to point-of-care testing (n = 100) or the control group (n = 100). 85 patients had community acquired pneumonia (42 in the mPOCT group and 43 in the control group), 69 hospital acquired pneumonia (30 in mPOCT and 39 in control) and 46 ventilator associated pneumonia (28 in mPOCT and 18 in control). The median [IQR] time to results was 1.7 [1.6-1.9] hours for point-of-care testing and 66.7 [56.7-88.5] hours for standard diagnostics (difference of -65.0 h, 95%CI -68.0 to -62.0; p < 0.0001). 71 (71%) patients in the point-of-care testing arm had pathogens detected compared to 51 (51%) in the control arm (difference of 20%, 95%CI 7 to 33; p = 0.004). 80 (80%) of patients in the point-of-care group received results-directed therapy, compared with 29 (29%) of 99 in the control group (difference of 51%, 95%CI 39-63; p < 0.0001). Time to results-directed therapy was 2.3 [1.8-7.2] hours in the mPOCT group and 46.1 [23.0-51.5] hours in the control group (difference of -43.8 h, 95% CI -48.9 to -38.6; p < 0.0001). 42 (42%) patients in mPOCT group had antibiotics de-escalated compared with 8 (8%) of 98 in the control group (difference of 34%, 95%CI 23-45; p < 0.0001). Time to de-escalation was 4.8 [2.4-13.0] hours in the mPOCT group compared with 46.5 [26.3-48.6] hours in the control group (difference of -41.4 h, 95%CI -53 to -29.7; p < 0.0001). There was no major difference in antibiotic duration or in clinical or safety outcomes between the two groups.
Conclusions: Use of molecular point-of-care testing in patients with pneumonia returned results more rapidly and identified more pathogens than conventional testing. This was associated with improvements in appropriate antimicrobial use and appeared safe.
Keywords: Community acquired pneumonia (CAP); Hospital acquired pneumonia (HAP); Molecular diagnostics; Pneumonia; Point-of-care testing; Rapid diagnostics; Ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP).
Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Competing Interest TWC has received equipment and consumables free-of-charge from Biofire diagnostics and BioMeriuex to support this work. TWC has received speaker fees, honoraria, travel reimbursement, and equipment and consumables at discount or free of charge for the purposes independent of research, outside of this submitted study, from BioFire diagnostics, BioMerieux and QIAGEN. TWC has received consultancy fees from Cepheid, Synairgen research, Randox laboratories and Cidara therapeutics. He has received honoraria for participation in advisory boards from Cepheid, Roche, Janssen and Shionogi. He is a member of independent data monitoring committees for trials sponsored by Roche. He has acted as the UK chief investigator for studies sponsored by Janssen. All other authors have completed the Unified Competing Interest form (available on request from the corresponding author) and declare: no support from any organisation for the submitted work no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years, no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Similar articles
-
Clinical impact of syndromic molecular point-of-care testing for gastrointestinal pathogens in adults hospitalised with suspected gastroenteritis (GastroPOC): a pragmatic, open-label, randomised controlled trial.Lancet Infect Dis. 2023 Aug;23(8):945-955. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(23)00066-X. Epub 2023 Apr 25. Lancet Infect Dis. 2023. PMID: 37116527 Clinical Trial.
-
Clinical impact of a routine, molecular, point-of-care, test-and-treat strategy for influenza in adults admitted to hospital (FluPOC): a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.Lancet Respir Med. 2021 Apr;9(4):419-429. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30469-0. Epub 2020 Dec 4. Lancet Respir Med. 2021. PMID: 33285143 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
INHALE WP3, a multicentre, open-label, pragmatic randomised controlled trial assessing the impact of rapid, ICU-based, syndromic PCR, versus standard-of-care on antibiotic stewardship and clinical outcomes in hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia.Intensive Care Med. 2025 Feb;51(2):272-286. doi: 10.1007/s00134-024-07772-2. Epub 2025 Feb 17. Intensive Care Med. 2025. PMID: 39961847 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Rapid syndromic molecular testing in pneumonia: The current landscape and future potential.J Infect. 2020 Jan;80(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2019.11.021. Epub 2019 Dec 3. J Infect. 2020. PMID: 31809764 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Safety of De-Escalating Empiric Antimicrobial Agents in Trauma Patients with Indigenous Oral Flora Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia.Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2022 Aug;23(6):597-603. doi: 10.1089/sur.2022.126. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2022. PMID: 35917387 Review.
Cited by
-
Breaking Boundaries in Pneumonia Diagnostics: Transitioning from Tradition to Molecular Frontiers with Multiplex PCR.Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Apr 2;14(7):752. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14070752. Diagnostics (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38611665 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Pneumonia: Recent Updates on Diagnosis and Treatment.Microorganisms. 2025 Feb 27;13(3):522. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms13030522. Microorganisms. 2025. PMID: 40142415 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Differential Diagnosis of Suspected Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbations in the Acute Care Setting: Best Practice.Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2023 May 1;207(9):1134-1144. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202209-1795CI. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2023. PMID: 36701677 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Rapid Molecular Diagnostics of Pneumonia Caused by Gram-Negative Bacteria: A Clinician's Review.Antibiotics (Basel). 2024 Aug 25;13(9):805. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13090805. Antibiotics (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39334980 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Detecting Respiratory Pathogens for Diagnosing Lower Respiratory Tract Infections at the Point of Care: Challenges and Opportunities.Biosensors (Basel). 2025 Feb 20;15(3):129. doi: 10.3390/bios15030129. Biosensors (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40136926 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous