Therapy with voretigene neparvovec. How to measure success?
- PMID: 36096933
- DOI: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2022.101115
Therapy with voretigene neparvovec. How to measure success?
Abstract
Retinal gene supplementation therapy such as the first approved one, voretigene neparvovec, delivers a functioning copy of the missing gene enabling the protein transcription in retinal cells and restore visual functions. After gene supplementation for the genetic defect, a complex network of functional regeneration is the consequence, whereas the extent is very individualized. Diagnostic and functional testings that have been used routinely by ophthalmologists so far to define the correct diagnosis, cannot be applied in the new context of defining small, sometimes subtle changes in visual functions. New view on retinal diagnostics is needed to understand this processes that define safety and efficacy of the treatment. Not only does vision have many aspects that must be addressed by specific evaluations and imaging techniques, but objective readouts of local retinal function for rods and cones separately have been an unmet need until recently. A reliable test-retest variability is necessary in rare diseases such as inherited retinal dystrophies, because statistics are often not applicable due to a low number of participants. Methods for a reliable individual evaluation of the therapy success are needed. In this manuscript we present an elaboration on retinal diagnostics combining psychophysics (eg. full-field stimulus threshold or dark adapted perimetry) as well as objective measures for local retinal function (eg. photopic and scotopic chromatic pupil campimetry) and retinal imaging for a meaningful workflow to apply in evaluation of the individual success in patients receiving gene therapy for photoreceptor diseases.
Keywords: Efficacy; Gene therapy; RPE65; Retinal functional diagnostics; Retinitis pigmentosa; Safety.
Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest Friederike Kortüm: Novartis (R); Katarina Stingl: ProQR (F,C), Johnson& Johnson (F), ViGeneron (C), Novartis (C,R), SANTEN (C), Nayan Therapeutics (C), with all fees paid to University of Tuebingen to support research. Susanne Kohl: Novartis (R). Krunoslav Stingl, Melanie Kempf, Milda Reith, Sypridon Dimopoulos, Saskia Ott, Ronja Jung, Giulia Righetti: none.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
