Temporal trends and long-term outcomes among recipients of cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator in the United States, 2011-2015: Insights from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry
- PMID: 36097450
- PMCID: PMC9463686
- DOI: 10.1016/j.hroo.2022.03.004
Temporal trends and long-term outcomes among recipients of cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator in the United States, 2011-2015: Insights from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry
Abstract
Background: Contemporary data on national trends and outcomes in cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator (CRT-D) recipients following the 2012 updated guidelines has not been studied.
Objectives: This study assessed the trends in long-term outcomes among CRT-D Medicare-aged recipients implanted in 2011-2015.
Methods: Patients aged ≥65 years undergoing de novo CRT-D implantation in the National Cardiovascular Data Implantable Cardiac Defibrillator Registry from 2011-2015 with follow-up through 2017 using Medicare data were included and stratified by year of implant. Patient characteristics, in-hospital outcomes, and outcomes up to 2 years following implant were evaluated.
Results: Among 53,174 patients (aged 75.6-6.4 years, 29.7% women) implanted with CRT-D from 2011 to 2015, there was an increase in implantations based on guideline-concordant recommendations (81.0% to 84.7%, P < .001). Compared to 2011, in-hospital procedural complications decreased in 2015 (3.9% vs 2.9%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.76, 95% confidence interval, 0.66-0.88, P < .001), driven in part by decreased lead dislodgement (1.4% vs 1.0%). After multivariable adjustment, there was a lower risk of all-cause hospitalization, cardiovascular hospitalization, and mortality at 2-year follow-up in 2015 as compared to 2011, while there were no differences in heart failure hospitalizations at follow-up.
Conclusion: Among Medicare beneficiaries receiving CRT-D from 2011 to 2015, there was an increase in implantations based on guideline-concordant recommendations. Furthermore, there has been a reduction in in-hospital complications and long-term outcomes, including cardiovascular hospitalization, all-cause hospitalization, and mortality; however, there has been no difference in the risk of heart failure hospitalization after adjustment.
Keywords: Cardiac resynchronization therapy; Implantable cardiac defibrillator; Outcomes research; Registries; Trends.
© 2022 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Use and Outcomes of Dual Chamber or Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Defibrillators Among Older Patients Requiring Ventricular Pacing in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Registry.JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jan 4;4(1):e2035470. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.35470. JAMA Netw Open. 2021. PMID: 33496796 Free PMC article.
-
Use of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Among Eligible Patients Receiving an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator: Insights From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Registry.JAMA Cardiol. 2017 May 1;2(5):561-565. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2016.5388. JAMA Cardiol. 2017. PMID: 28122073 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative Effectiveness of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Among Patients With Heart Failure and Atrial Fibrillation: Findings From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry's Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Registry.Circ Heart Fail. 2016 Jun;9(6):10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.115.002324 e002324. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.115.002324. Circ Heart Fail. 2016. PMID: 27296396 Free PMC article.
-
Temporal trends in patient characteristics and outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries undergoing primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator placement in the United States, 2006-2010. Results from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry's Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Registry.Circulation. 2014 Sep 2;130(10):845-53. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.008653. Epub 2014 Aug 5. Circulation. 2014. PMID: 25095884
-
Long-term efficacy of implantable cardiac resynchronization therapy plus defibrillator for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death in patients with mild heart failure: an updated meta-analysis.Heart Fail Rev. 2016 Jul;21(4):447-53. doi: 10.1007/s10741-016-9550-y. Heart Fail Rev. 2016. PMID: 27043219 Review.
Cited by
-
Association between frailty and adverse outcomes after cardiac resynchronization therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur Geriatr Med. 2025 Feb;16(1):165-177. doi: 10.1007/s41999-024-01112-9. Epub 2024 Dec 4. Eur Geriatr Med. 2025. PMID: 39630191 Free PMC article.
-
Landmark Evolutions in Time and Indication for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Results from a Multicenter Retrospective Registry.J Clin Med. 2024 Mar 25;13(7):1903. doi: 10.3390/jcm13071903. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 38610667 Free PMC article.
-
Improved prognosis after cardiac resynchronization therapy over a decade.Europace. 2023 Jun 2;25(6):euad141. doi: 10.1093/europace/euad141. Europace. 2023. PMID: 37265253 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bristow M.R., Saxon L.A., Boehmer J., et al. Cardiac-resynchronization therapy with or without an implantable defibrillator in advanced chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2140–2150. - PubMed
-
- Tang A.S., Wells G.A., Talajic M., et al. Cardiac-resynchronization therapy for mild-to-moderate heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:2385–2395. - PubMed
-
- Moss A.J., Hall W.J., Cannom D.S., et al. Cardiac-resynchronization therapy for the prevention of heart-failure events. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1329–1338. - PubMed
-
- Moynahan M., Faris O.P., Lewis B.M. Cardiac resynchronization devices: the Food and Drug Administration's regulatory considerations. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:2325–2328. - PubMed
-
- Sridhar A.R., Yarlagadda V., Parasa S., et al. Cardiac resynchronization therapy: US trends and disparities in utilization and outcomes. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2016;9 - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials