Intratubular penetration capacity of HiFlow bioceramic sealer used with warm obturation techniques and single cone: A confocal laser scanning microscopic study
- PMID: 36097475
- PMCID: PMC9463577
- DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10388
Intratubular penetration capacity of HiFlow bioceramic sealer used with warm obturation techniques and single cone: A confocal laser scanning microscopic study
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this paper was to evaluate the intratubular penetration area of a bioceramic sealer, using continuous wave (CW), vertical condensation (VC) with two different types of gutta-percha (conventional (NG) and bioceramic-coated (BG)) and single cone (SC) technique with BG gutta-percha, in different root thirds.
Methods: A total of 150 mature single-root human teeth (including incisors, canines and premolars) were prepared and randomly divided into five groups (n = 30). Teeth were filled using a bioceramic sealer (TotalFill BC Sealer HiFlow ®) and two different types of gutta-percha, with CW and VC techniques, the teeth in the control group were filled with SC technique and BG gutta-percha. The teeth were sectioned and evaluated as one-third portions in each case under a confocal laser microscope. The penetration area measurements were carried out with the Autocad ® programme. Data was analyzed using the one-factor ANOVA test (p < 0.05) and Post Hoc Test (p < 0.05).
Results: The ANOVA Test showed significant differences in the penetration areas of the five obturation techniques (P < 0.05). The Post Hoc Test exhibited significant differences in multiple comparisons (P < 0.05). There was more dentinal tubule penetration in the coronal third than in the apical third in all techniques.
Conclusions: The intratubular penetration of the bioceramic sealer was influenced by the obturation techniques tested, but not by the different gutta-percha tested. There was more penetration of sealer in the warm obturation techniques than the SC, regardless of the type of gutta-percha used.
Keywords: Bioceramic sealer; Confocal laser scanning microscopy; Single cone; Tubule penetration; Warm gutta-percha techniques.
© 2022 The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Prestegaard H., Portenier I., Ørstavik D., Kayaoglu G., Haapasalo M., Endal U. Antibacterial activity of various root canal sealers and root-end filling materials in dentin blocks infected ex vivo with Enterococcus faecalis. Acta Odontol. Scand. 2014;72(8):970–976. - PubMed
-
- Dornelles N.B.J., Collares F.M., Genari B., de Souza Balbinot G., Samuel S.M.W., Arthur R.A., Visioli F., Guterres S.S., Leitune V.C.B. Influence of the addition of microsphere load amoxicillin in the physical, chemical and biological properties of an experimental endodontic sealer. J. Dent. 2018;68:28–33. - PubMed
-
- Sjogren U., Hagglund B., Sundqvist G., Wing K. Factors affecting the long-term results of endodontic treatment. J. Endod. 1990;16(10):498–504. - PubMed
-
- Nielsen B.A., Beeler W.J., Vy C., Baumgartner J.C. Setting times of Resilon and other sealers in aerobic and anaerobic environments. J. Endod. 2006;32(2):130–132. - PubMed
-
- Haragushiku G.A., Sousa-Neto M.D., Silva-Sousa Y.T., Alfredo E., Silva S.C., Silva R.G. Adhesion of endodontic sealers to human root dentine submitted to different surface treatments. Photomed. Laser Surg. 2010;28(3):405–410. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
