Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec;25(6):2837-2850.
doi: 10.1111/hex.13590. Epub 2022 Sep 13.

Barriers of and strategies for shared decision-making implementation in the care of metastatic breast cancer: A qualitative study among patients and healthcare professionals in an Asian country

Ping Yein Lee  1   2 , Ai Theng Cheong  2 , Sazlina Shariff Ghazali  2 , Aneesa Abdul Rashid  2 , Siu Ching Ong  2   3 , Soo Ying Ong  2   3 , Adlinda Alip  4 , McCarthy Sylvia  5 , May Feng Chen  4 , Nur Aishah Taib  6 , Maheswari Jaganathan  3 , Chirk Jenn Ng  7   8   9 , Soo-Hwang Teo  3
Affiliations

Barriers of and strategies for shared decision-making implementation in the care of metastatic breast cancer: A qualitative study among patients and healthcare professionals in an Asian country

Ping Yein Lee et al. Health Expect. 2022 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Shared decision-making has been shown to improve the quality of life in metastatic breast cancer patients in high-literacy and high-resource settings. However, limited studies have examined the cultural preferences of metastatic breast cancer patients with shared decision-making implementation and the barriers encountered in an Asian setting where societal norms predominate and physician decision-making is at the forefront. This paper aims to identify (1) barriers to practising shared decision-making faced by healthcare professionals and patients and (2) strategies for implementing shared decision-making in the context of metastatic breast cancer management in Malaysia.

Methods: We conducted a qualitative study involving 12 patients diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer, 16 healthcare professionals and 5 policymakers from surgical and oncology departments at public healthcare centres in Malaysia. Semi-structured in-depth interviews and focus group discussions were conducted. The interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using the thematic approach. Nvivo software was used to manage and analyse the data.

Results: Five main themes emerged from the study: healthcare provider-patient communication, workforce availability, cultural and belief systems, goals of care and paternalism versus autonomy. Other strategies proposed to overcome barriers to implementing shared decision-making were training of healthcare professionals and empowering nurses to manage patients' psychosocial issues.

Conclusion: This study found that practising shared decision-making in the public health sector remains challenging when managing patients with metastatic breast cancer. The utilization of decision-making tools, patient empowerment and healthcare provider training may help address the system and healthcare provider-patient barriers identified in this study.

Patient or public contribution: Patients were involved in the study design, recruitment and analysis.

Keywords: metastatic breast cancer; qualitative research; shared decision-making.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Kashaf MS, McGill E. Does shared decision making in cancer treatment improve quality of life? A systematic literature review. Med Decis Making. 2015;35(8):1037‐1048. - PubMed
    1. Hack TF, Degner LF, Watson P, Sinha L. Do patients benefit from participating in medical decision making? Longitudinal follow‐up of women with breast cancer. Psychooncology. 2006;15(1):9‐19. 10.1002/pon.907 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Spronk I, Burgers JS, Schellevis FG, van Vliet LM, Korevaar JC. The availability and effectiveness of tools supporting shared decision making in metastatic breast cancer care: a review. BMC Palliat Care. 2018;17(1):74. 10.1186/s12904-018-0330-4 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Glatzer M, Panje CM, Sirén C, Cihoric N, Putora PM. Decision making criteria in oncology. Oncology. 2020;98(6):370‐378. 10.1159/000492272 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hibbard JH, Greene J. What the evidence shows about patient activation: better health outcomes and care experiences; fewer data on costs. Health Aff. 2013;32(2):207‐214. - PubMed

Publication types