Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan;61(1):99-108.
doi: 10.1002/uog.26073.

Reproductive outcome in 326 women with unicornuate uterus

Affiliations

Reproductive outcome in 326 women with unicornuate uterus

T Tellum et al. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Jan.

Abstract

Objectives: To study the reproductive outcomes of women with a unicornuate uterus and compare them to those of women with no congenital uterine anomaly.

Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study. Cases were women aged at least 16 years who were diagnosed with a unicornuate uterus on transvaginal/transrectal ultrasound between January 2008 and September 2021. Controls were women with no congenital uterine anomaly matched 1:1 by age and body mass index. The primary outcome was live-birth rate. Secondary outcomes were pregnancy loss (miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy, termination of pregnancy), preterm delivery, mode of delivery and concomitant gynecological abnormalities (endometriosis, adenomyosis, fibroids).

Results: Included in the study were 326 cases and 326 controls. Women with a unicornuate uterus had a significantly lower live-birth rate (184/388 (47.4%) vs 229/396 (57.8%); P = 0.004) and higher rates of overall miscarriage (178/424 (42.0%) vs 155/465 (33.3%); adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 2.21 (95% CI, 1.42-3.42), P < 0.001), ectopic pregnancy (26/424 (6.1%) vs 11/465 (2.4%); aOR, 2.52 (95% CI, 1.22-5.22), P = 0.01), preterm delivery (45/184 (24.5%) vs 17/229 (7.4%); aOR, 3.04 (95% CI, 1.52-5.97), P = 0.001) and Cesarean delivery (116/184 (63.0%) vs 70/229 (30.6%); aOR, 2.54 (95% CI, 1.67-3.88), P < 0.001). Rudimentary-horn pregnancies accounted for 7/26 (26.9%) ectopic pregnancies in the study group. Women with a unicornuate uterus were more likely to have endometriosis (17.5% vs 10.7%; P = 0.018) and adenomyosis (26.7% vs 15.6%; P = 0.001), but were not more likely to have fibroids compared with controls. Women with a functional rudimentary horn were more likely to have pelvic endometriosis compared to those without (odds ratio, 2.4 (95% CI, 1.4-4.1), P = 0.002).

Conclusions: Pregnant women with a unicornuate uterus should be classified as high risk. Removal of a functional rudimentary horn should be discussed with the patient to prevent a rudimentary-horn ectopic pregnancy. © 2022 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Keywords: adenomyosis; ectopic pregnancy; endometriosis; miscarriage; uterine anomaly.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Three‐dimensional transvaginal ultrasound rendering of unicornuate uterus in coronal plane in four patients, showing hemiuterus (U) and rudimentary horn (formula image). (a) Right hemiuterus and non‐functional left rudimentary horn. Cavity of hemiuterus is narrow in fundal area and only a single interstitial portion of Fallopian tube is visible. (b) Right hemiuterus and non‐communicating left rudimentary horn. Cavity of horn contains functional endometrium with visible adenomyosis (A), represented by anechoic myometrial cyst with thin hyperechogenic rim protruding into cavity. (c) Right hemiuterus with hyperechogenic endometrium and functional, non‐communicating left rudimentary horn, with blood distending the cavity. (d) Right hemiuterus and duplex ectopic pregnancy in non‐communicating left rudimentary horn, where two gestational sacs (P) are visualized. (e) Right hemiuterus in same woman as in (d), 3 months after uneventful excision of rudimentary horn containing ectopic pregnancy.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Schematic diagram depicting subtypes of unicornuate uterus: (a) hemiuterus without rudimentary horn; (b) hemiuterus with non‐functional rudimentary horn; (c) hemiuterus with functional, non‐communicating rudimentary horn; and (d) hemiuterus with functional, communicating rudimentary horn.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Flowchart summarizing inclusion of patients in study. *Representing clinical consultations, not individuals. BMI, body mass index.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Nahum GG. Uterine anomalies. How common are they, and what is their distribution among subtypes? J Reprod Med 1998; 43: 877–887. - PubMed
    1. Jurkovic D, Gruboeck K, Tailor A, Nicolaides KH. Ultrasound screening for congenital uterine anomalies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 104: 1320–1321. - PubMed
    1. Prior M, Richardson A, Asif S, Polanski L, Parris‐Larkin M, Chandler J, Fogg L, Jassal P, Thornton JG, Raine‐Fenning NJ. Outcome of assisted reproduction in women with congenital uterine anomalies: a prospective observational study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2018; 51: 110–117. - PubMed
    1. Chan YY, Jayaprakasan K, Tan A, Thornton JG, Coomarasamy A, Raine‐Fenning NJ. Reproductive outcomes in women with congenital uterine anomalies: a systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 38: 371–382. - PubMed
    1. Fedele L, Bianchi S, Agnoli B, Tozzi L, Vignali M. Urinary tract anomalies associated with unicornuate uterus. J Urol 1996; 155: 847–848. - PubMed

Publication types

Supplementary concepts