ED to ED transfer does not prolong emergency department stays in a rural trauma system
- PMID: 36100509
- DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.08.059
ED to ED transfer does not prolong emergency department stays in a rural trauma system
Abstract
Background: In many rural trauma systems injured patients are initially evaluated at a local hospital, and once stabilized transferred to a trauma center for definitive care. In the U.S. most trauma transfers occur as emergency department (ED) to ED transfers, however there is little evidence to guide systems in whether this is beneficial. We implemented a practice change in August 2018, changing from commonly admitting trauma transfers directly to the floor, to a protocol for ED to ED transfer for all trauma patients. We aimed to evaluate this practice change and its effects on outcomes and ED length of stay.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all trauma transfers to our Level 1 trauma center between 8/1/2017-8/30/2020. Study groups were created based on the presence of a transfer protocol: a control group with no protocol, a selective ED pitstop protocol group and a systemwide ED pitstop protocol group. We compared patient and injury factors between groups, and evaluated each group's hospital mortality, unplanned ICU admission within 24 h, need for return to radiology for imaging, and ED length of stay.
Results: 1,987 patients were transferred during the study period. In our control group 37% of transfers were directly admitted. Implementing a selective ED pitstop decreased direct admissions to 17% and a systemwide ED pitstop decreased direct admissions to 10%. There was no difference in mortality between groups. Protocol implementation decreased unplanned ICU admissions from 2% to 1% in the selective protocol and 0.8% in the systemwide protocol, as well as decreasing the need for further diagnostic imaging (5% to 2.5% and 2%; in each group respectively). ED length of stay was not different between time periods.
Conclusions: Implementing an ED pitstop protocol for trauma transfers led to decreased direct admissions, without increasing the ED length of stay, and less need for delayed imaging.
Keywords: Emergency department; Outcomes; Rural; Transfer; Trauma.
Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Competing Interest All authors (Colling, Hoff, Harry, and Scott) have no conflicts of interests (direct or indirect) or other disclosures to disclose. There is no funding to disclose for this work. All work is original and is the work of the above-mentioned authors and has not been published elsewhere.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources