Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb;10(2):424-434.
doi: 10.1002/nop2.1364. Epub 2022 Sep 13.

Efficacy and safety of non-pharmacological interventions for endotracheal suctioning pain in preterm infants: A systematic review

Affiliations

Efficacy and safety of non-pharmacological interventions for endotracheal suctioning pain in preterm infants: A systematic review

Qian Cai et al. Nurs Open. 2023 Feb.

Abstract

Aim: To review and analyse the evidence on the efficacy and safety of non-pharmacological interventions for preterm infants to relieve endotracheal suctioning (ES) pain.

Design: A systematic review per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.

Methods: Six databases were searched with a retrieval strategy. Parallel and crossover randomized controlled trials reporting non-pharmacological interventions for relieving ES pain in preterm infants were identified from inception to 1 September 2021. The protocol was published in PROSPERO (CRD42021276058).

Results: Ten studies were retrieved, including nine different non-pharmacological interventions. Seven studies reported that non-pharmacological interventions in relieving pain were more effective than conventional care during ES, and three trials reported its safety. Due to the heterogeneity of pain assessment tools, time of assessment and population, only Facilitated tucking had sufficient evidence that it is a safe and effective non-pharmacological intervention.

Keywords: analgesia; endotracheal suctioning; non-pharmacological interventions; pain; preterm infants.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
PRIMSA flow diagram
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Risk of bias assessment for the RCTs

References

    1. Agakidou, E. , Tsoni, K. , Stathopoulou, T. , Thomaidou, A. , Farini, M. , Kontou, A. , & Sarafidis, K. (2021). Changes in physicians' perceptions and practices on neonatal pain management over the past 20 years. A survey conducted at two time‐points. Frontiers in Pediatrics, 9, 667806. 10.3389/fped.2021.667806 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alinejad‐Naeini, M. , Mohagheghi, P. , Peyrovi, H. , & Mehran, A. (2014). The effect of facilitated tucking during endotracheal suctioning on procedural pain in preterm neonates: A randomized controlled crossover study. Global Journal of Health Science, 6(4), 278–284. 10.5539/gjhs.v6n4p278 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Axelin, A. , Salantera, S. , Kirjavainen, J. , & Lehtonen, L. (2009). Oral glucose and parental holding are preferable to opioid in pain management in preterm infants. The Clinical Journal of Pain, 25(2), 138–145. 10.1097/AJP.0b013e318181ad81 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Axelin, A. , Salantera, S. , & Lehtonen, L. (2006). 'Facilitated tucking by parents' in pain management of preterm infants‐a randomized crossover trial. Early Human Development, 82(4), 241–247. 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2005.09.012 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Benoit, B. , Martin‐Misener, R. , Latimer, M. , & Campbell‐Yeo, M. (2017). Breast‐feeding analgesia in infants: An update on the current state of evidence. The Journal of Perinatal and Neonatal Nursing, 31(2), 145–159. 10.1097/jpn.0000000000000253 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types