Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan;48(2):281-289.
doi: 10.1038/s41386-022-01408-z. Epub 2022 Sep 13.

Evidence from "big data" for the default-mode hypothesis of ADHD: a mega-analysis of multiple large samples

Affiliations

Evidence from "big data" for the default-mode hypothesis of ADHD: a mega-analysis of multiple large samples

Luke J Norman et al. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2023 Jan.

Abstract

We sought to identify resting-state characteristics related to attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder, both as a categorical diagnosis and as a trait feature, using large-scale samples which were processed according to a standardized pipeline. In categorical analyses, we considered 1301 subjects with diagnosed ADHD, contrasted against 1301 unaffected controls (total N = 2602; 1710 males (65.72%); mean age = 10.86 years, sd = 2.05). Cases and controls were 1:1 nearest neighbor matched on in-scanner motion and key demographic variables and drawn from multiple large cohorts. Associations between ADHD-traits and resting-state connectivity were also assessed in a large multi-cohort sample (N = 10,113). ADHD diagnosis was associated with less anticorrelation between the default mode and salience/ventral attention (B = 0.009, t = 3.45, p-FDR = 0.004, d = 0.14, 95% CI = 0.004, 0.014), somatomotor (B = 0.008, t = 3.49, p-FDR = 0.004, d = 0.14, 95% CI = 0.004, 0.013), and dorsal attention networks (B = 0.01, t = 4.28, p-FDR < 0.001, d = 0.17, 95% CI = 0.006, 0.015). These results were robust to sensitivity analyses considering comorbid internalizing problems, externalizing problems and psychostimulant medication. Similar findings were observed when examining ADHD traits, with the largest effect size observed for connectivity between the default mode network and the dorsal attention network (B = 0.0006, t = 5.57, p-FDR < 0.001, partial-r = 0.06, 95% CI = 0.0004, 0.0008). We report significant ADHD-related differences in interactions between the default mode network and task-positive networks, in line with default mode interference models of ADHD. Effect sizes (Cohen's d and partial-r, estimated from the mega-analytic models) were small, indicating subtle group differences. The overlap between the affected brain networks in the clinical and general population samples supports the notion of brain phenotypes operating along an ADHD continuum.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Forest plots for brain network metrics that differed significantly (corrected p < 0.05) between N = 1301 ADHD cases and N = 1301 non-ADHD controls.
The top line shows the effect size (Cohen’s d) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals for the main mega-analytic model. The subsequent rows show the results of models performed within each cohort (NCR N = 122; HBN = 575; ADHD200-Peking N = 199; ADHD200-NYU N = 182; ABCD N = 1524). Panel (A) shows the results for connectivity between the default mode network and the dorsal attention network. Panel (B) shows the results for connectivity between the default mode network and the salience/ventral attention network. Panel (C) shows the results for connectivity between the default mode network and somatomotor network.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Associations between ADHD diagnosis and connectivity within and between brain networks.
Red indicates a negative association. Blue indicates a positive association. Darker shades represent stronger associations. Effect sizes from the linear mixed models are presented for network connections significant at p < 0.05 after correction for multiple comparisons.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Forest plots for significant associations (corrected p < 0.05) between ADHD-traits and resting-state connectivity (N = 10,113).
The top line shows the effect size (partial r) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals for the main mega-analytic model. The subsequent rows show the results of models performed within each cohort (NCR N = 100; NCANDA N = 504; HCP-D N = 494; HBN N = 692; ABCD N = 8323). Panel (A) shows the results for connectivity between the default mode network and the dorsal attention network. Panel (B) Shows the results for connectivity between the default mode network and the frontoparietal network. Panel (C) Shows the results for connectivity within the dorsal attention network. Panel (D) Shows the results for connectivity between the default mode network and the salience/ventral attention network. Panel (E) Shows the results for connectivity between the salience/ventral attention network and the somatomotor network. Panel (F) Shows the results for connectivity between the default mode network and the somatomotor network.

References

    1. Association AP. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®). American Psychiatric Pub; 2013. - PubMed
    1. Bozhilova NS, Michelini G, Kuntsi J, Asherson P. Mind wandering perspective on attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2018;92:464–76. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.07.010. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sonuga-Barke EJS, Castellanos FX. Spontaneous attentional fluctuations in impaired states and pathological conditions: a neurobiological hypothesis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2007;31:977–86. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2007.02.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Castellanos FX, Proal E. Large-scale brain systems in ADHD: beyond the prefrontal–striatal model. Trends Cogn Sci. 2012;16:17–26. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2011.11.007. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Raichle ME. The brain’s default mode network. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2015;38:433–47. doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-071013-014030. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Grants and funding