Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov;32(11):3589-3599.
doi: 10.1007/s11695-022-06212-8. Epub 2022 Sep 14.

Hospital Variation in Preference for a Specific Bariatric Procedure and the Association with Weight Loss Performance: a Nationwide Analysis

Erman O Akpinar  1   2 , Ronald S L Liem  3   4 , Simon W Nienhuijs  5 , Jan Willem M Greve  6   7   8 , Perla J Marang-van de Mheen  9 ; Dutch Audit for Treatment of Obesity Research Group
Collaborators, Affiliations

Hospital Variation in Preference for a Specific Bariatric Procedure and the Association with Weight Loss Performance: a Nationwide Analysis

Erman O Akpinar et al. Obes Surg. 2022 Nov.

Abstract

Purpose: Hospitals performing a certain bariatric procedure in high volumes may have better outcomes. However, they could also have worse outcomes for some patients who are better off receiving another procedure. This study evaluates the effect of hospital preference for a specific type of bariatric procedure on their overall weight loss results.

Methods: All hospitals performing bariatric surgery were included from the nationwide Dutch Audit for Treatment of Obesity. For each hospital, the expected (E) numbers of sleeve gastrectomy (SG), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), and one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) were calculated given their patient-mix. These were compared with the observed (O) numbers as the O/E ratio in a funnel plot. The 95% control intervals were used to identify outlier hospitals performing a certain procedure significantly more often than expected given their patient-mix (defined as hospital preference for that procedure). Similarly, funnel plots were created for the outcome of patients achieving ≥ 25% total weight loss (TWL) after 2 years, which was linked to each hospital's preference.

Results: A total of 34,558 patients were included, with 23,154 patients completing a 2-year follow-up, of whom 79.6% achieved ≥ 25%TWL. Nine hospitals had a preference for RYGB (range O/E ratio [1.09-1.53]), with 1 having significantly more patients achieving ≥ 25%TWL (O/E ratio [1.06]). Of 6 hospitals with a preference for SG (range O/E ratio [1.10-2.71]), one hospital had significantly fewer patients achieving ≥ 25%TWL (O/E ratio [0.90]), and from two hospitals with a preference for OAGB (range O/E ratio [4.0-6.0]), one had significantly more patients achieving ≥ 25%TWL (O/E ratio [1.07]). One hospital had no preference for any procedure but did have significantly more patients achieving ≥ 25%TWL (O/E ratio [1.10]).

Conclusion: Hospital preference is not consistently associated with better overall weight loss results. This suggests that even though experience with a procedure may be slightly less in hospitals not having a preference, it is still sufficient to achieve similar weight loss outcomes when surgery is provided in centralized high-volume bariatric institutions.

Keywords: Bariatric surgery; Centralized bariatric care; Hospital preference; Hospital variation; Hospital volume; Textbook outcome; Weight loss.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Boxplot showing the distribution of the median percentage (IQR) of patient characteristics by hospital in the Netherlands
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Patient-mix adjusted funnel plot showing hospital variation in preference for RYGB, SG, and OAGB procedures
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Patient-mix adjusted funnel plot showing hospital variation in 25% TWL after 2 years related to preference for type of procedure
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Patient-mix adjusted funnel plot showing hospital variation on textbook outcome related to preference for type of procedure
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Schauer PR, Bhatt DL, Kirwan JP, et al. Bariatric Surgery versus Intensive Medical Therapy for Diabetes — 5-Year Outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(7):641–51. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Peterli R, Wölnerhanssen B, Peters T, et al. Effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on weight loss in patients with morbid obesity: the SM-BOSS randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;319:255–265. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.20897. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Magouliotis DE, Tasiopoulou VS, Tzovaras G. One Anastomosis gastric bypass versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity: an updated meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2019;29:2721–2730. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-04005-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Musella M, Vitiello A. The YOMEGA non-inferiority trial. Lancet. Elsevier; 2019;394:1412. - PubMed
    1. O’Brien P, Hindle A, Brennan L, et al. Long-term outcomes after bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of weight loss at 10 or more years for all bariatric procedures and a single-centre review of 20-year outcomes after adjustable gastric banding. Obes Surg. 2019;29:3–14. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3525-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed