Biostimulant Capacity of Chlorella and Chlamydopodium Species Produced Using Wastewater and Centrate
- PMID: 36101464
- PMCID: PMC9312269
- DOI: 10.3390/biology11071086
Biostimulant Capacity of Chlorella and Chlamydopodium Species Produced Using Wastewater and Centrate
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to assess the potential of producing four microalgal strains using secondary-treated urban wastewater supplemented with centrate, and to evaluate the biostimulant effects of several microalgal extracts obtained using water and sonication. Four strains were studied: Chlorella vulgaris UAL-1, Chlorella sp. UAL-2, Chlorella vulgaris UAL-3, and Chlamydopodium fusiforme UAL-4. The highest biomass productivity was found for C. fusiforme, with a value of 0.38 ± 0.01 g·L-1·day-1. C. vulgaris UAL-1 achieved a biomass productivity of 0.31 ± 0.03 g·L-1·day-1 (the highest for the Chlorella genus), while the N-NH4+, N-NO3-, and P-PO43- removal capacities of this strain were 51.9 ± 2.4, 0.8 ± 0.1, and 5.7 ± 0.3 mg·L-1·day-1, respectively. C. vulgaris UAL-1 showed the greatest potential for use as a biostimulant-when used at a concentration of 0.1 g·L-1, it increased the germination index of watercress seeds by 3.5%. At concentrations of 0.5 and 2.0 g·L-1, the biomass from this microalga promoted adventitious root formation in soybean seeds by 220% and 493%, respectively. The cucumber expansion test suggested a cytokinin-like effect from C. vulgaris UAL-1; it was also the only strain that promoted the formation of chlorophylls in wheat leaves. Overall, the results of the present study suggest the potential of producing C. vulgaris UAL-1 using centrate and wastewater as well as the potential utilisation of its biomass to develop high-value biostimulants.
Keywords: auxins; biomass; biostimulants; gibberellins; microalgae; wastewater.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Figures






References
-
- Odegard I.Y.R., van der Voet E. The future of food—Scenarios and the effect on natural resource use in agriculture in 2050. Ecol. Econ. 2014;97:51–59. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.10.005. - DOI
-
- Zambrano-Monserrate M.A., Carvajal-Lara C., Urgilés-Sanchez R., Ruano M.A. Deforestation as an indicator of environmental degradation: Analysis of five European countries. Ecol. Indic. 2018;90:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.02.049. - DOI
-
- Barros M.V., Salvador R., de Francisco A.C., Piekarski C.M. Mapping of research lines on circular economy practices in agriculture: From waste to energy. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2020;131:109958. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2020.109958. - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources