Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Oct 16;2(2):62-69.
doi: 10.1176/appi.prcp.20190046. eCollection 2020 Dec.

Pathological Lying: Theoretical and Empirical Support for a Diagnostic Entity

Drew A Curtis  1 , Christian L Hart  2
Affiliations

Pathological Lying: Theoretical and Empirical Support for a Diagnostic Entity

Drew A Curtis et al. Psychiatr Res Clin Pract. .

Abstract

Objective: Pathological lying, originally called "pseudologia phantastica," has an established history within clinical practice and literature, although it has not been recognized as a psychological disorder within major nosological systems. With the movement in psychological sciences toward theory-driven, empirically supported diagnoses, the current study sought to empirically test whether pathological lying aligned with nosological definitions and could be defined as a diagnostic entity.

Methods: A total of 807 people were recruited (January to October of 2019) from various mental health forums, social media, and a university. Of those recruited, 623 completed the study. Participants responded to a lie frequency prompt, questionnaires about lying behavior, the Lying in Everyday Situations Scale, the Distress Questionnaire-5, and demographic questions.

Results: Of the participants, 13% indicated that they self- identified or that others had identified them as pathological liars (telling numerous lies each day for longer than 6 months). People who identified as pathological liars reported greater distress, impaired functioning, and more danger than people not considered pathological liars. Pathological lying seemed to be compulsive, with lies growing from an initial lie, and done for no apparent reason.

Conclusions: The evidence supports establishment of pathological lying as a distinct diagnostic entity. A definition of pathological lying, etiological considerations, and recommendations for future research and practice are presented.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.
Screen shot of lie frequency assessmenta aSource: Serota et al. (1).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Serota KB, Levine TR, Boster FJ: The prevalence of lying in America: three studies of self‐reported lies. Hum Commun Res 2010; 36:2–25
    1. Serota KB, Levine TR: A few prolific liars: variation in the prevalence of lying. J Lang Soc Psychol 2015; 34:138–157
    1. Vrij A: Detecting Lies and Deceit: Pitfalls and Opportunities, 2nd ed. New York, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2008.
    1. DePaulo BM, Kashy DA, Kirkendol SE, et al: Lying in everyday life. J Pers Soc Psychol 1996; 70:979–995 - PubMed
    1. Levine TR: Encyclopedia of Deception. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage Publications, 2014.