Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct 26;10(5):e0241922.
doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02419-22. Epub 2022 Sep 14.

L-Form Switching in Escherichia coli as a Common β-Lactam Resistance Mechanism

Affiliations

L-Form Switching in Escherichia coli as a Common β-Lactam Resistance Mechanism

Aleksandra Petrovic Fabijan et al. Microbiol Spectr. .

Abstract

Cell wall deficient bacterial L-forms are induced by exposure to cell wall-targeting antibiotics and immune effectors such as lysozyme. L-forms of different bacteria (including Escherichia coli) have been reported in human infections, but whether this is a normal adaptive strategy or simply an artifact of antibiotic treatment in certain bacterial species remains unclear. Here we show that members of a representative, diverse set of pathogenic E. coli readily proliferate as L-forms in supratherapeutic concentrations of the broad-spectrum antibiotic meropenem. We report that they are completely resistant to antibiotics targeting any penicillin-binding proteins in this state, including PBP1A/1B, PBP2, PBP3, PBP4, and PBP5/6. Importantly, we observed that reversion to the cell-walled state occurs efficiently, less than 20 h after antibiotic cessation, with few or no changes in DNA sequence. We defined for the first time a logarithmic L-form growth phase with a doubling time of 80 to 190 min, followed by a stationary phase in late cultures. We further demonstrated that L-forms are metabolically active and remain normally susceptible to antibiotics that affect DNA torsion and ribosomal function. Our findings provide insights into the biology of L-forms and help us understand the risk of β-lactam failure in persistent infections in which L-forms may be common. IMPORTANCE Bacterial L-forms require specialized culture techniques and are neither widely reported nor well understood in human infections. To date, most of the studies have been conducted on Gram-positive and stable L-form bacteria, which usually require mutagenesis or long-term passages for their generation. Here, using an adapted osmoprotective growth media, we provide evidence that pathogenic E. coli can efficiently switch to L-forms and back to a cell-walled state, proliferating aerobically in supratherapeutic concentrations of antibiotics targeting cell walls with few or no changes in their DNA sequences. Our work demonstrates that L-form switching is an effective adaptive strategy in stressful environments and can be expected to limit the efficacy of β-lactam for many important infections.

Keywords: Escherichia coli; L-forms; antibiotic resistance; refractory infections; β-lactams.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
Meropenem promotes L-form growth from the walled state under aerobic conditions. (A) Model illustrating how pathogenic E. coli can switch in and out of the L-form state in response to the antibiotic challenge. (B) E. coli L-form strain WH62 switch in the presence of meropenem and reversion to the cell walled state after meropenem withdrawal. (C) Time-lapse DIC microscopy of WH62 L-forms; individual micrograph frames are extracted from Movie S1, posted at https://figshare.com/s/09b4bbc18c62c1d6aadd. (D) Susceptibility of E. coli L-forms to β-lactams, aminoglycosides, and fluoroquinolones by standard Etest. MEM, meropenem; FOX, cefoxitin; ATM, aztreonam; CRO, ceftriaxone; AMX, amoxicillin; GEN, gentamicin; CIP, ciprofloxacin.
FIG 2
FIG 2
WH62 E. coli L-form growth kinetics and proliferation rates in LFA medium supplemented with the antibiotic meropenem. (A) Growth curves of J53 (ST10) and WH62 (ST127) L-forms. (B) Bacterial cell area fluctuations between division measured in 22 cells. (C) Length of L-form cell cycle measured in 22 different L-form cells. (D) Mode of cell division of L-forms, division by budding; see also Movie S1, posted at https://figshare.com/s/09b4bbc18c62c1d6aadd. Time 0 (origin) indicates the first division event in the L-form state.
FIG 3
FIG 3
Effects of the L-form switch on susceptibility to myoviruses. (A) Comparative analysis of phage genomes. Schematics show the genomic organization of phages vB_EcoM_OMNI-2 (Eco2), 6 (Eco6), and 12 (Eco12; GenBank OL362041) compared to available reference genomes (T4-like phage NC_000866.4 and V5-like phage DQ832317.1) (left). (B) Phage susceptibility of E. coli L-forms using standard spot assay and modified LFA; WH62 and JIE4799 meropenem-induced L-forms displaying resistance (no lysis) to T4-like phages (Eco2 and Eco12) (bottom right) and sensitivity to V5-like phages (Eco6) (top right), respectively. Control involved cell-walled counterpart on standard LBA without meropenem (left top and bottom) lysed by all three phages. (C) Growth curves of walled bacteria (WH62 on LBA) and L-forms (L-WH62 on LFA supplemented with meropenem) in the presence of Eco12 phage at MOI 1.
Fig 4
Fig 4
The double-layer method was used to test the L-form switching in pathogenic strains of E. coli.

References

    1. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2021. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, 31st ed. CLSI, Berwyn, PA.
    1. Petrovic Fabijan A, Lin RCY, Ho J, Maddocks S, Ben Zakour NL, Iredell JR, Westmead Bacteriophage Therapy Team . 2020. Safety of bacteriophage therapy in severe Staphylococcus aureus infection. Nat Microbiol 5:465–472. doi:10.1038/s41564-019-0634-z. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Poole K. 2012. Bacterial stress responses as determinants of antimicrobial resistance. J Antimicrob Chemother 67:2069–2089. doi:10.1093/jac/dks196. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kolter R, Siegele DA, Tormo A. 1993. The stationary phase of the bacterial life cycle. Annu Rev Microbiol 47:855–874. doi:10.1146/annurev.mi.47.100193.004231. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gibson B, Wilson DJ, Feil E, Eyre-Walker A. 2018. The distribution of bacterial doubling times in the wild. Proc Biol Sci 285:20180789. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources