Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun;17(3):805-814.
doi: 10.1007/s11764-022-01252-6. Epub 2022 Sep 14.

Job loss, return to work, and multidimensional well-being after breast cancer treatment in working-age Black and White women

Affiliations

Job loss, return to work, and multidimensional well-being after breast cancer treatment in working-age Black and White women

Marc A Emerson et al. J Cancer Surviv. 2023 Jun.

Abstract

Purpose: Breast cancer survivorship has improved in recent decades, but few studies have assessed the patterns of employment status following diagnosis and the impact of job loss on long-term well-being in ethnically diverse breast cancer survivors. We hypothesized that post-treatment employment status is an important determinant of survivor well-being and varies by race and age.

Methods: In the Carolina Breast Cancer Study, 1646 employed women with primary breast cancer were longitudinally evaluated for post-diagnosis job loss and overall well-being. Work status was classified as "sustained work," "returned to work," "job loss," or "persistent non-employment." Well-being was assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT-G) instrument. Analysis of covariance was used to evaluate the association between work status and well-being (physical, functional, social, and emotional).

Results: At 25 months post-diagnosis, 882 (53.6%) reported "sustained work," 330 (20.1%) "returned to work," 162 (9.8%) "job loss," and 272 (16.5%) "persistent non-employment." Nearly half of the study sample (46.4%) experienced interruptions in work during 2 years post-diagnosis. Relative to baseline (5-month FACT-G), women who sustained work or returned to work had higher increases in all well-being domains than women with job loss and persistent non-employment. Job loss was more common among Black than White women (adjusted odds ratio = 3.44; 95% confidence interval 2.37-4.99) and was associated with service/laborer job types, lower education and income, later stage at diagnosis, longer treatment duration, and non-private health insurance. However, independent of clinical factors, job loss was associated with lower well-being in multiple domains.

Conclusions: Work status is commonly disrupted in breast cancer survivors, but sustained work is associated with well-being. Interventions to support women's continued employment after diagnosis are an important dimension of breast cancer survivorship.

Implications for cancer survivors: Our findings indicate that work continuation and returning to work may be a useful measure for a range of wellbeing concerns, particularly among Black breast cancer survivors who experience greater job loss.

Keywords: Breast cancer; Employment; Health-related quality of life; Job loss; Racial disparities; Return to work; Well-being.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose

Disclosures: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of participants’ working status from baseline (5-months after diagnosis) and 25-months after diagnosis. Green node (n=882) indicates “sustained work”; blue node (n=330) indicates “return to work”; purple node (n=162) indicates “job loss”; and orange node (n=272) indicates “persistent non-employment”. The primary difference between the ‘job loss’ and ‘return to work’ categories is that at the 25-month interview, the ‘job loss’ category still had not reported resumption of employment.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sun Y, Shigaki CL, Armer JM. Return to work among breast cancer survivors: A literature review. Support Care Cancer. 2017;25(3):709–18. Epub 2016/11/23. doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3446-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cocchiara RA, Sciarra I, D’Egidio V, Sestili C, Mancino M, Backhaus I, et al. Returning to work after breast cancer: A systematic review of reviews. Work (Reading, Mass). 2018;61(3):463–76. Epub 2018/11/08. doi: 10.3233/wor-182810. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Islam T, Dahlui M, Majid HA, Nahar AM, Mohd Taib NA, Su TT. Factors associated with return to work of breast cancer survivors: a systematic review. BMC public health. 2014;14 Suppl 3:S8. Epub 2014/12/02. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-s3-s8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stanton AL, Bower JE. Psychological Adjustment in Breast Cancer Survivors. Advances in experimental medicine and biology. 2015;862:231–42. Epub 2015/06/11. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-16366-6_15. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stafford L, Judd F, Gibson P, Komiti A, Mann GB, Quinn M. Screening for depression and anxiety in women with breast and gynaecologic cancer: course and prevalence of morbidity over 12 months. Psycho-oncology. 2013;22(9):2071–8. Epub 2013/02/13. doi: 10.1002/pon.3253. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types