Long-term Outcomes Among Men Undergoing Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer in Sweden
- PMID: 36103180
- PMCID: PMC9475386
- DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.31015
Long-term Outcomes Among Men Undergoing Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer in Sweden
Abstract
Importance: The long-term outcomes among men with prostate cancer (PC) whose disease is managed with active surveillance (AS) remains unknown.
Objective: To develop a simulation model with a 30-year follow-up for men with PC managed with AS.
Design, setting, and participants: In this cohort study, a state transition model was created using data from Prostate Cancer data Base Sweden (PCBaSe) on 23 655 men diagnosed with PC and managed with deferred treatment to estimate treatment trajectories. A simulation was performed with 100 000 men in each combination of age at diagnosis, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and PC risk with a follow-up of 30 years.
Main outcomes and measures: Death from PC and death from other causes were estimated, and the proportion of time without active PC treatment was assessed until date of death or age 85 years.
Results: This study included 23 655 men from PCBaSe with a median age at diagnosis of 69 years (IQR, 64-74 years). Of these, 16 177 men underwent active surveillance for PC and 7478 underwent watchful waiting. The proportion of men who were diagnosed at age 55 years and died of PC before age 85 years was 9% for very low-risk PC, 13% for low-risk PC, and 15% for intermediate-risk PC. Among men with a Charlson Comorbidity Index of 0 who were diagnosed at age 70 years, the corresponding percentages were 3%, 6%, and 7%, respectively. The mean proportion of remaining life-years without active PC treatment for men diagnosed at age 55 years was 12 of 25 years (48%) for very low-risk PC, 9 of 25 years (36%) for low-risk PC, and 7 of 25 (29%) for intermediate-risk PC. For men aged 70 years, the corresponding numbers were 10 of 13 years (77%), 9 of 13 years (66%), and 8 of 13 years (60%), respectively. Men with intermediate-risk PC who were younger than 60 years at diagnosis had a high risk of PC death (12%-15%) and fewer remaining life-years without active PC treatment (29%-33%). In contrast, men with low-risk PC who were older than 65 years at diagnosis had a lower risk of PC death (3%-5%) and more remaining life-years without active PC treatment (62%-77%).
Conclusions and relevance: The findings of this Swedish cohort study suggest that active surveillance may be a safe strategy for disease management among men with PC who were older than 65 years at diagnosis.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures




Comment in
-
Exploring the Long-term Outcomes of Active Surveillance Among Men With Prostate Cancer-Best for Whom?JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Sep 1;5(9):e2231024. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.31024. JAMA Netw Open. 2022. PMID: 36103186 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Natural History of Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer Managed With Watchful Waiting.JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jun 3;7(6):e2414599. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.14599. JAMA Netw Open. 2024. PMID: 38833251 Free PMC article.
-
Population based study of use and determinants of active surveillance and watchful waiting for low and intermediate risk prostate cancer.J Urol. 2013 Nov;190(5):1742-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.05.054. Epub 2013 May 30. J Urol. 2013. PMID: 23727309
-
Outcome following active surveillance of men with screen-detected prostate cancer. Results from the Göteborg randomised population-based prostate cancer screening trial.Eur Urol. 2013 Jan;63(1):101-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.08.066. Epub 2012 Sep 5. Eur Urol. 2013. PMID: 22980443 Clinical Trial.
-
An evidence review of active surveillance in men with localized prostate cancer.Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2011 Dec;(204):1-341. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2011. PMID: 23126653 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Study of Active Monitoring in Sweden (SAMS): a randomized study comparing two different follow-up schedules for active surveillance of low-risk prostate cancer.Scand J Urol. 2013 Oct;47(5):347-55. doi: 10.3109/21681805.2013.813962. Epub 2013 Jul 24. Scand J Urol. 2013. PMID: 23883427 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Gleason 6 prostate cancer: That which cannot be named.Front Oncol. 2022 Dec 5;12:1073580. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1073580. eCollection 2022. Front Oncol. 2022. PMID: 36544706 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Location and Types of Treatment for Prostate Cancer After the Veterans Choice Program Implementation.JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Oct 2;6(10):e2338326. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.38326. JAMA Netw Open. 2023. PMID: 37856123 Free PMC article.
-
Natural History of Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer Managed With Watchful Waiting.JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jun 3;7(6):e2414599. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.14599. JAMA Netw Open. 2024. PMID: 38833251 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Outcomes of Active Surveillance in Intermediate-Risk Versus Low-Risk Localised Prostate Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.J Clin Med. 2023 Apr 6;12(7):2732. doi: 10.3390/jcm12072732. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 37048815 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Variations in the Uptake of Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer and Its Impact on Outcomes.Eur Urol Open Sci. 2023 May 15;52:166-173. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2023.04.006. eCollection 2023 Jun. Eur Urol Open Sci. 2023. PMID: 37284040 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bruinsma SM, Roobol MJ, Carroll PR, et al. ; Movember Foundation’s Global Action Plan Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance (GAP3) consortium . Expert consensus document: semantics in active surveillance for men with localized prostate cancer—results of a modified Delphi consensus procedure. Nat Rev Urol. 2017;14(5):312-322. doi:10.1038/nrurol.2017.26 - DOI - PubMed
-
- National Prostate Cancer Register . RATTEN—interactive online report from NPCR. 2021. Accessed February 1, 2021. https://statistik.incanet.se/npcr/
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials