Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep;9(1):e000744.
doi: 10.1136/lupus-2022-000744.

Interleukin (IL) 16: a candidate urinary biomarker for proliferative lupus nephritis

Affiliations

Interleukin (IL) 16: a candidate urinary biomarker for proliferative lupus nephritis

Aliisa Häyry et al. Lupus Sci Med. 2022 Sep.

Abstract

Objective: Lupus nephritis (LN) is a severe manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The pathogenesis is incompletely understood and diagnostic biomarkers are scarce. We investigated interleukin (IL) 16 as a potential biomarker for LN in a well-characterised cohort of patients with SLE.

Methods: We measured urinary (u-) and plasma (p-) levels of IL-16 in predefined patient groups using ELISA: LN (n=84), active non-renal SLE (n=63), inactive non-renal SLE (n=73) and matched population controls (n=48). The LN group included patients with recent biopsy-confirmed proliferative (PLN, n=47), mesangioproliferative (MES, n=11) and membranous (MLN, n=26) LN. Renal expression of IL-16 was investigated by immunohistochemistry. Associations between IL-16 measurements and clinical parameters and the diagnostic value for LN were explored.

Results: p-IL-16 was detected in all investigated cases and high p-IL-16 levels were observed in patients with active SLE. u-IL-16 was detected (dt-u-IL-16) in 47.6% of patients with LN, while only up to 17.8% had dt-u-IL-16 in other groups. In the LN group, 68% of patients with PLN had dt-u-IL-16, while the proportions in the MLN and MES groups were lower (11.5% and 45.5%, respectively). The highest u-IL-16 levels were detected in the PLN group. In the regression model, u-IL-16 levels differentiated PLN from other LN patient subgroups (area under the curve 0.775-0.896, p<0.0001). dt-u-IL-16 had superior specificity but slightly lower sensitivity than elevated anti-double-stranded DNA and low complement C3 or C4 in diagnosing PLN. A high proportion of LN kidney infiltrating cells expressed IL-16.

Conclusions: We demonstrate that detectable u-IL-16 can differentiate patients with PLN from those with less severe LN subtypes and active non-renal SLE. Our findings suggest that u-IL-16 could be used as a screening tool at suspicion of severe LN. Furthermore, the high IL-16 levels in plasma, urine and kidney tissue imply that IL-16 could be explored as a therapeutic target in SLE.

Keywords: cytokines; inflammation; lupus nephritis; systemic lupus erythematosus.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Distribution of plasma (p-) and urine (u-) IL-16 levels among the investigated groups. (A) Patients with LN had higher plasma levels of IL-16 in comparison with patients with INR-SLE and pCs. (B) Patients with LN had the highest urine levels of IL-16 in comparison with other investigated groups: ANR-SLE, INR-SLE and pCs. (C) p-IL-16 levels did not differ among the investigated LN classes: PLN, MLN and MES. (D) Patients with PLN had higher u-IL-16 levels than patients with MLN or MES. ANR, active non-renal; IL-16, interleukin 16; INR, inactive non-renal; LN, lupus nephritis; MES, mesangioproliferative lupus nephritis; MLN, membranous lupus nephritis; ns, not significant; pCs, population controls; PLN, proliferative lupus nephritis; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Logistic regression analysis of the diagnostic value of plasma (p-) and urinary (u-) IL-16 in subgroups of patients with LN. (A) ROC curves for u-IL-16, p-IL-16 and u-ACR demonstrate how these variables differentiate LN from ANR-SLE. (B) AUC demonstrates the diagnostic value of u-IL-16 and p-IL-16 for PLN compared with u-ACR among patients with other LN classes. (C) AUC demonstrates the diagnostic value of u-IL-16 and p-IL-16 for active PLN compared with u-ACR among patients with LN. (D) ROC analysis demonstrates the discriminative value of u-IL-16 and p-IL-16 in differentiating active PLN from MLN. (E) Discriminative value of u-IL-16 and p-IL-16 in differentiating PLN from other LN classes in patients with significant albuminuria of u-ACR >30 (corresponding to proteinuria of 500 mg/24 hours). (F) Discriminative value of u-IL-16 and p-IL-16 in differentiating PLN from other LN classes in patients with high albuminuria of u-ACR >50. ACR, albumin to creatinine ratio; ANR-SLE, active non-renal SLE; AUC, area under the curve; IL, interleukin 16; LN, lupus nephritis; MES, mesangioproliferative lupus nephritis; MLN, membranous lupus nephritis; PLN, proliferative lupus nephritis; ROC, receiver operator characteristic curve; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Expression of IL-16 and CD3 in LN kidney biopsies. (A) A high proportion of kidney infiltrating mononuclear cells express IL-16 in untreated PLN. (B) Numerically, a lower proportion of IL-16 positive cells were observed in patients with PLN with ongoing treatment (example of a patient on 10 mg of steroids). (C) A proportion of IL-16 positive kidney infiltrating cells were observed in MLN. (D) A proportion of the infiltrating cells express T cell marker CD3. IL-16, interleukin 16; LN, lupus nephritis; MLN, membranous lupus nephritis; PLN, proliferative lupus nephritis.

References

    1. Anders H-J, Saxena R, Zhao M-hui, et al. . Lupus nephritis. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2020;6:7. 10.1038/s41572-019-0141-9 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Weening JJ, D'Agati VD, Schwartz MM, et al. . The classification of glomerulonephritis in systemic lupus erythematosus revisited. J Am Soc Nephrol 2004;15:241–50. 10.1097/01.ASN.0000108969.21691.5D - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fasano S, Pierro L, Borgia A, et al. . Biomarker panels may be superior over single molecules in prediction of renal flares in systemic lupus erythematosus: an exploratory study. Rheumatology 2020;59:3193–200. 10.1093/rheumatology/keaa074 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tan G, Baby B, Zhou Y, et al. . Emerging molecular markers towards potential diagnostic panels for lupus. Front Immunol 2022;12:808839. 10.3389/fimmu.2021.808839 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yoon T, Pyo JY, Ahn SS, et al. . Serum interleukin-16 significantly correlates with the vasculitis damage index in antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis. Arthritis Res Ther 2020;22:73. 10.1186/s13075-020-02172-5 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types