Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug 29:13:975560.
doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.975560. eCollection 2022.

Outcome of giant pituitary tumors requiring surgery

Affiliations

Outcome of giant pituitary tumors requiring surgery

Stephan Gaillard et al. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). .

Abstract

Objective: The management of giant pituitary tumors is complex, with few publications and recommendations. Consequently, patient's care mainly relies on clinical experience. We report here a first large series of patients with giant pituitary tumors managed by a multidisciplinary expert team, focusing on treatments and outcome.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted. Giant pituitary tumors were defined by a main diameter > 40mm. Macroprolactinomas sensitive to dopamine agonists were excluded. All patients were operated by a single neurosurgical team. After surgery, multimodal management was proposed, including hormone replacement, radiotherapy and anti-tumor medical therapies. Outcome was modeled using Kaplan-Meyer representation. A logistic regression model was built to identify the risk factors associated with surgical complications.

Results: 63 consecutive patients presented a giant adenoma, most often with visual defects. Patients were operated once, twice or three times in 59%, 40% and 1% of cases respectively, mainly through endoscopic endonasal approach. Giant adenomas included gonadotroph, corticotroph, somatotroph, lactotroph and mixed GH-PRL subtypes in 67%, 14%, 11%, 6% and 2% of patients respectively. Vision improved in 89% of patients with prior visual defects. Severe surgical complications occurred in 11% of patients, mainly for tumors > 50 mm requiring microscopic transcranial approach. Additional radiotherapy was needed for 29% of patients, 3 to 56 months after first surgery. For 6% of patients, Temozolomide treatment was required, 19 to 66 months after first surgery.

Conclusions: Giant pituitary tumors require multimodal management, with a central role of surgery. Most often, tumor control can be achieved by expert multidisciplinary teams.

Keywords: adenoma; aggressiveness; complication; giant pituitary tumor; radiotherapy; surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Different patterns of giant tumors extension Preoperative pituitary MRI are presented, including gadolinium-enhanced T1 weighted sagittal (A, B), coronal (C–E) and T2 weighted coronal (F) images. (A) subfrontal extension (white arrow); (B) posterior fossa extension (white arrow); (C) suprasellar extension with a “narrow neck” aspect between the intrasellar and the suprasellar tumor components; (D) encasement of the right anterior cerebral artery (white arrow); (E) massive invasive sphenoid tumor bridging the two cavernous sinuses, defined as “sphenoid arch” aspect (white dotted rectangle); (F) tumor extension through the roof-top of the right cavernous sinus (white arrow).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Surgical resection of giant pituitary tumors Pituitary MRI from three patients are presented, before and after surgery (gadolinium-enhanced T1 weighted coronal and sagittal images). (A-D) Giant pituitary tumor with a “narrow neck” pattern, resected with an extended endoscopic endonasal approach. (E-H) Giant pituitary tumor with transdiaphragmatic subfrontal extension, resected in two steps with combined endoscopic endonasal and microscopic transcranial approaches. (I-L) Giant pituitary tumor with a huge suprasellar expansion extending beyond the Monro foramen, resected with a transfrontal transcranial approach.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Cumulative incidence of patients requiring radiotherapy after surgery (Kaplan-Meyer representation).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Cumulative incidence of patients requiring chemotherapy after surgery (Kaplan–Meyer representation).

References

    1. Daly AF, Beckers A. The epidemiology of pituitary adenomas. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am (2020) 49:347–55. doi: 10.1016/j.ecl.2020.04.002 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shimon I, Jallad RS, Fleseriu M, Yedinak CG, Greenman Y, Bronstein MD. Giant GH-secreting pituitary adenomas: management of rare and aggressive pituitary tumors. Eur J Endocrinol (2015) 172:707–13. doi: 10.1530/EJE-14-1117 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Micko A, Agam MS, Brunswick A, Strickland BA, Rutkowski MJ, Carmichael JD, et al. . Treatment strategies for giant pituitary adenomas in the era of endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery: a multicenter series. J Neurosurg (2021) 136(3):1–10. doi: 10.3171/2021.1.JNS203982 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Makarenko S, Alzahrani I, Karsy M, Deopujari C, Couldwell WT. Outcomes and surgical nuances in management of giant pituitary adenomas: a review of 108 cases in the endoscopic era. J Neurosurg (2022), 1–12. doi: 10.3171/2021.10.JNS21659 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chibbaro S, Signorelli F, Milani D, Cebula H, Scibilia A, Bozzi MT, et al. . Primary endoscopic endonasal management of giant pituitary adenomas: Outcome and pitfalls from a Large prospective multicenter experience. Cancers (Basel) (2021) 13:3603. doi: 10.3390/cancers13143603 - DOI - PMC - PubMed