A qualitative study to explore opinions of Saudi Arabian radiologists concerning AI-based applications and their impact on the future of the radiology
- PMID: 36105424
- PMCID: PMC9459863
- DOI: 10.1259/bjro.20210029
A qualitative study to explore opinions of Saudi Arabian radiologists concerning AI-based applications and their impact on the future of the radiology
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to explore opinions and views towards radiology AI among Saudi Arabian radiologists including both consultants and trainees.
Methods: A qualitative approach was adopted, with radiologists working in radiology departments in the Western region of Saudi Arabia invited to participate in this interview-based study. Semi-structured interviews (n = 30) were conducted with consultant radiologists and trainees. A qualitative data analysis framework was used based on Miles and Huberman's philosophical underpinnings.
Results: Several factors, such as lack of training and support, were attributed to the non-use of AI-based applications in clinical practice and the absence of radiologists' involvement in AI development. Despite the expected benefits and positive impacts of AI on radiology, a reluctance to use AI-based applications might exist due to a lack of knowledge, fear of error and concerns about losing jobs and/or power. Medical students' radiology education and training appeared to be influenced by the absence of a governing body and training programmes.
Conclusion: The results of this study support the establishment of a governing body or national association to work in parallel with universities in monitoring training and integrating AI into the medical education curriculum and residency programmes.
Advances in knowledge: An extensive debate about AI-based applications and their potential effects was noted, and considerable exceptions of transformative impact may occur when AI is fully integrated into clinical practice. Therefore, future education and training programmes on how to work with AI-based applications in clinical practice may be recommended.
© 2022 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest: We certify that there is no actual or potential conflict of interest in relation to this article (there are none).
Figures


Similar articles
-
A study to explore opinions and attitudes of Saudi Arabian MR professionals on the current status of routine MR scanner quality assurance testing in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.Radiography (Lond). 2018 Nov;24(4):e98-e104. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2018.05.008. Epub 2018 Jun 6. Radiography (Lond). 2018. PMID: 30292520
-
Saudi Radiology Personnel's Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence Implementation: A Cross-Sectional Study.J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021 Nov 23;14:3225-3231. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S340786. eCollection 2021. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021. PMID: 34848967 Free PMC article.
-
Mapping the future: The current landscape and future directions of evidence-based practice in Saudi radiology departments.PLoS One. 2025 Feb 4;20(2):e0314332. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314332. eCollection 2025. PLoS One. 2025. PMID: 39903733 Free PMC article.
-
Systematic Review of Radiologist and Medical Student Attitudes on the Role and Impact of AI in Radiology.Acad Radiol. 2022 Nov;29(11):1748-1756. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2021.12.032. Epub 2022 Jan 31. Acad Radiol. 2022. PMID: 35105524
-
Canadian Association of Radiologists White Paper on Artificial Intelligence in Radiology.Can Assoc Radiol J. 2018 May;69(2):120-135. doi: 10.1016/j.carj.2018.02.002. Epub 2018 Apr 11. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2018. PMID: 29655580 Review.
Cited by
-
The barriers, motives, perceptions, and attitudes toward research among radiology practitioners and interns in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study.Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Oct 9;10:1266285. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1266285. eCollection 2023. Front Med (Lausanne). 2023. PMID: 37877018 Free PMC article.
-
Artificial intelligence for diagnostics in radiology practice: a rapid systematic scoping review.EClinicalMedicine. 2025 May 12;83:103228. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103228. eCollection 2025 May. EClinicalMedicine. 2025. PMID: 40474995 Free PMC article.
-
Medical Expectations of Physicians on AI Solutions in Daily Practice: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.JMIRx Med. 2024 Mar 25;5:e50803. doi: 10.2196/50803. JMIRx Med. 2024. PMID: 38535503 Free PMC article.
-
The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging: A Nationwide Pilot Survey of Trainees in Saudi Arabia.Clin Pract. 2022 Oct 28;12(6):852-866. doi: 10.3390/clinpract12060090. Clin Pract. 2022. PMID: 36412669 Free PMC article.
-
Health Care Professionals' Concerns About Medical AI and Psychological Barriers and Strategies for Successful Implementation: Scoping Review.J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 23;27:e66986. doi: 10.2196/66986. J Med Internet Res. 2025. PMID: 40267462 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Ranschaert ER, Morozov S, Algra PR. Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging. Cham: Springer; 2019. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-94878-2 - DOI
-
- Huisman M, Ranschaert E, Parker W, Mastrodicasa D, Koci M, Pinto de Santos D, et al. . An international survey on AI in radiology in 1,041 radiologists and radiology residents part 1: fear of replacement, knowledge, and attitude. Eur Radiol 2021; 31: 7058–66. 10.1007/s00330-021-07781-5 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources