Interfacility Transport of Critically Ill Patients
- PMID: 36106970
- DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005639
Interfacility Transport of Critically Ill Patients
Abstract
Objectives: To assess recent advances in interfacility critical care transport.
Data sources: PubMed English language publications plus chapters and professional organization publications.
Study selection: Manuscripts including practice manuals and standard (1990-2021) focused on interfacility transport of critically ill patients.
Data extraction: Review of society guidelines, legislative requirements, objective measures of outcomes, and transport practice standards occurred in work groups assessing definitions and foundations of interfacility transport, transport team composition, and transport specific considerations. Qualitative analysis was performed to characterize current science regarding interfacility transport.
Data synthesis: The Task Force conducted an integrative review of 496 manuscripts combined with 120 from the authors' collections including nonpeer reviewed publications. After title and abstract screening, 40 underwent full-text review, of which 21 remained for qualitative synthesis.
Conclusions: Since 2004, there have been numerous advances in critical care interfacility transport. Clinical deterioration may be mitigated by appropriate patient selection, pretransport optimization, and transport by a well-resourced team and vehicle. There remains a dearth of high-quality controlled studies, but notable advances in monitoring, en route management, transport modality (air vs ground), as well as team composition and training serve as foundations for future inquiry. Guidance from professional organizations remains uncoupled from enforceable regulations, impeding standardization of transport program quality assessment and verification.
Copyright © 2022 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Drs. Wilcox, Cohen, and Frakes receive partial salary support from Boston MedFlight. Dr. Cohen disclosed that he serves as Chief Medical Officer for Boston MedFlight. Dr. Wax receives partial salary support from Ornge. Dr. Guyette receives partial salary support from STAT MedEvac. Dr. Kaplan received funding from the Society of Critical Care Medicine as President from February 2020 to February 2021. The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Iwashyna TJ, Christie JD, Moody J, et al.: The structure of critical care transfer networks. Med Care 2009; 47:787–793
-
- Stock C, Cocchi M, Clardy P, et al.: How a healthcare system leveraged ICU patient load balancing to manage the COVID-19 pandemic surge. Crit Care Med 2021; 49:35
-
- Nguyen YL, Kahn JM, Angus DC: Reorganizing adult critical care delivery: The role of regionalization, telemedicine, and community outreach. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2010; 181:1164–1169
-
- Kahn JM, Linde-Zwirble WT, Wunsch H, et al.: Potential value of regionalized intensive care for mechanically ventilated medical patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2008; 177:285–291
-
- Badulak J, Antonini MV, Stead CM, et al.; ELSO COVID-19 Working Group Members: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for COVID-19: Updated 2021 guidelines from the extracorporeal life support organization. ASAIO J 2021; 67:485–495
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials

