Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2022 Sep 24;400(10357):1008-1019.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01659-2. Epub 2022 Sep 12.

Combined nivolumab and ipilimumab with or without stereotactic body radiation therapy for advanced Merkel cell carcinoma: a randomised, open label, phase 2 trial

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Combined nivolumab and ipilimumab with or without stereotactic body radiation therapy for advanced Merkel cell carcinoma: a randomised, open label, phase 2 trial

Sungjune Kim et al. Lancet. .

Abstract

Background: Merkel cell carcinoma is among the most aggressive and lethal of primary skin cancers, with a high rate of distant metastasis. Anti-programmed death receptor 1 (anti-PD-1) and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) monotherapy is currently standard of care for unresectable, recurrent, or metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma. We assessed treatment with combined nivolumab plus ipilimumab, with or without stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in patients with advanced Merkel cell carcinoma as a first-line therapy or following previous treatment with anti-PD-1 and PD-L1 monotherapy.

Methods: In this randomised, open label, phase 2 trial, we randomly assigned adults from two cancer sites in the USA (one in Florida and one in Ohio) to group A (combined nivolumab and ipilimumab) or group B (combined nivolumab and ipilimumab plus SBRT) in a 1:1 ratio. Eligible patients were aged at least 18 years with histologically proven advanced stage (unresectable, recurrent, or stage IV) Merkel cell carcinoma, a minimum of two tumour lesions measureable by CT, MRI or clinical exam, and tumour tissue available for exploratory biomarker analysis. Patients were stratified by previous immune-checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) status to receive nivolumab 240 mg intravenously every 2 weeks plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg intravenously every 6 weeks (group A) or the same schedule of combined nivolumab and ipilimumab with the addition of SBRT to at least one tumour site (24 Gy in three fractions at week 2; group B). Patients had to have at least two measurable sites of disease so one non-irradiated site could be followed for response. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) in all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of combined nivolumab and ipilimumab. ORR was defined as the proportion of patients with a complete response or partial response per immune-related Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours. Response was assessed every 12 weeks. Safety was assessed in all patients. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03071406.

Findings: 50 patients (25 in both group A and group B) were enrolled between March 14, 2017, and Dec 21, 2021, including 24 ICI-naive patients (13 [52%] of 25 group A patients and 11 [44%] of 25 group B patients]) and 26 patients with previous ICI (12 [48%] of 25 group A patients and 14 [56%] of 25 group B patients]). One patient in group B did not receive SBRT due to concerns about excess toxicity. Median follow-up was 14·6 months (IQR 9·1-26·5). Two patients in group B were excluded from the analysis of the primary endpoint because the target lesions were irradiated and so the patients were deemed non-evaluable. Of the ICI-naive patients, 22 (100%) of 22 (95% CI 82-100) had an objective response, including nine (41% [95% CI 21-63]) with complete response. Of the patients who had previously had ICI exposure, eight (31%) of 26 patients (95% CI 15-52) had an objective response and four (15% [5-36]) had a complete response. No significant differences in ORR were observed between groups A (18 [72%] of 25 patients) and B (12 [52%] of 23 patients; p=0·26). Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events were observed in 10 (40%) of 25 patients in group A and 8 (32%) of 25 patients in group B.

Interpretation: First-line combined nivolumab and ipilimumab in patients with advanced Merkel cell carcinoma showed a high ORR with durable responses and an expected safety profile. Combined nivolumab and ipilimumab also showed clinical benefit in patients with previous anti-PD-1 and PD-L1 treatment. Addition of SBRT did not improve efficacy of combined nivolumab and ipilimumab. The combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab represents a new first-line and salvage therapeutic option for advanced Merkel cell carcinoma.

Funding: Bristol Myers Squibb Rare Population Malignancy Program.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interests SK reports research support from Bristol Myers Squibb for the submitted work and research support from Bristol Myers Squibb and AstraZeneca outside the submitted work. EW reports being a member of the advisory board for Viewray, Varian, Alphatau, Castle Biosciences, and Teiko outside the submitted work. ZE reports being a member of the advisory board for Array, Pfizer, OncoSec, Regeneron, Genentech, Novartis, Natera, and Eisai outside the submitted work and research support for Novartis, Pfizer, and Boehringer-Ingelheim outside the submitted work. JJC reports research support for Varian and Galera outside the submitted work. AT reports research support for Bristol Myers Squibb, Genentech-Roche, Regeneron, Sanofi-Genzyme, Nektar, Clinigen, Merck, Acrotech, Pfizer, Checkmate, and OncoSec outside the submitted work and personal fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Eisai, Instil Bio, Clinigen, Regeneron, Sanofi-Genzyme, Novartis, Partner Therapeutics, Genentech/Roche, and BioNTech outside the submitted work. JM reports research support from Microba, Jackson Laboratories, Merck, and Morphogenesis outside the submitted work. BAP reports being a member of the advisory board for Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, and G1 therapeutics outside the submitted work. VKS reports research support from Neogene and Turnstone outside the submitted work and being a member of the advisory board for Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, Iovance, Merck, Novartis, Regeneron, and Statking outside the submitted work. NIK reports being a member of the advisory board for Bristol Myers-Squibb, Regeneron, Merck, Jounce Therapeutics, Iovance Biotherapeutics, Genzyme, Novartis, Castle Biosciences, Nektar, and Instill Bio outside the submitted work; being a member of the steering or scientific committee for Nektar, Regeneron, Replimune, Bristol Myers-Squibb, and National Comprehensive Cancer Network via Pfizer outside the submitted work; being on the data safety monitoring committee for AstraZeneca and Incyte outside the submitted work; research support to his institution outside the submitted work from Bristol Myers-Squibb, Merck, Celgene, Regeneron, Replimune, Novartis, HUYA Bioscience, and GlaxoSmithKline); and common stock from Bellicum, Amarin, Asensus Surgical outside the submitted work. ASB reports being a member of the advisory board for Deciphera and Bayer outside the submitted work. All other authors have no interests to declare.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Flowchart of Study Population
aOne patient failed to receive SBRT due to concern for excess toxicity from overlap with the prior radiation field. bTwo patients received SBRT to the target lesion and were excluded from the objective response rate. Abbreviations: NIVO: nivolumab, IPI: ipilimumab, SBRT: stereotactic body radiation therapy
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Clinical Activity. A. Time to response and duration of response and duration of treatment were measured in 30 patients with a clinical response (complete or partial response). * represents progression (20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions or appearance of a new lesion) and ♦ represents death. B. Waterfall plot of best response percent change from baseline. Among 50 patients, 2 patients were excluded as the target lesions were irradiated. *, 8 patients experienced clinical progression prior to the first planned restaging. C. Spider plot of change in target lesion diameters and percentage of change in target lesion sum diameters from baseline in individual patients. 2 patients with irradiated target lesion and 8 patients with clinical progression prior to the first planned restaging are not shown.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Survival Outcome. A. Kaplan-Meier curves of progression-free survival for ICI naïve and Prior ICI cohort. B. Kaplan-Meier curves of overall survival for ICI naïve and Prior ICI cohort. C. Kaplan-Meier curves of local control of irradiated lesions in Arm B.

Comment in

References

    1. Harms PW, Harms KL, Moore PS, et al. The biology and treatment of Merkel cell carcinoma: current understanding and research priorities. Nature reviews Clinical oncology 2018; 15(12): 763–76. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schadendorf D, Lebbe C, Zur Hausen A, et al. Merkel cell carcinoma: Epidemiology, prognosis, therapy and unmet medical needs. European journal of cancer 2017; 71: 53–69. - PubMed
    1. Knepper TC, Montesion M, Russell JS, et al. The Genomic Landscape of Merkel Cell Carcinoma and Clinicogenomic Biomarkers of Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy. Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research 2019; 25(19): 5961–71. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kaufman HL, Russell J, Hamid O, et al. Avelumab in patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma: a multicentre, single-group, open-label, phase 2 trial. The Lancet Oncology 2016; 17(10): 1374–85. - PMC - PubMed
    1. D'Angelo SP, Lebbe C, Mortier L, et al. First-line avelumab in a cohort of 116 patients with metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma (JAVELIN Merkel 200): primary and biomarker analyses of a phase II study. J immunother Cancer 2021; 9(7). - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data