Molecular Markers of Response to Anti-PD1 Therapy in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- PMID: 36108710
- PMCID: PMC12182972
- DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2022.09.005
Molecular Markers of Response to Anti-PD1 Therapy in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Abstract
Background & aims: Single-agent anti-PD1 checkpoint inhibitors convey outstanding clinical benefits in a small fraction (∼20%) of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) but the molecular mechanisms determining response are unknown. To fill this gap, we herein analyze the molecular and immune traits of aHCC in patients treated with anti-PD1.
Methods: Overall, 111 tumor samples from patients with aHCC were obtained from 13 centers before systemic therapies. We performed molecular analysis and immune deconvolution using whole-genome expression data (n = 83), mutational analysis (n = 72), and histologic evaluation with an endpoint of objective response.
Results: Among 83 patients with transcriptomic data, 28 were treated in frontline, whereas 55 patients were treated after tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) either in second or third line. Responders treated in frontline showed upregulated interferon-γ signaling and major histocompatibility complex II-related antigen presentation. We generated an 11-gene signature (IFNAP), capturing these molecular features, which predicts response and survival in patients treated with anti-PD1 in frontline. The signature was validated in a separate cohort of aHCC and >240 patients with other solid cancer types where it also predicted response and survival. Of note, the same signature was unable to predict response in archival tissue of patients treated with frontline TKIs, highlighting the need for fresh biopsies before immunotherapy.
Conclusion: Interferon signaling and major histocompatibility complex-related genes are key molecular features of HCCs responding to anti-PD1. A novel 11-gene signature predicts response in frontline aHCC, but not in patients pretreated with TKIs. These results must be confirmed in prospective studies and highlights the need for biopsies before immunotherapy to identify biomarkers of response.
Keywords: Biomarkers; Hepatocellular Carcinoma; Immunotherapy; Predictors of Response.
Copyright © 2023 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest
These authors disclose the following: Jean-Francois Dufour has received consulting fees from AbbVie, Bayer Healthcare, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Falk, Genfit, Genkyotex, Gilead Sciences, HepaRegenix, Intercept, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Roche. Jens U. Marquardt received honoraria from Roche, Bayer, Ipsen, Merz, AstraZeneca, MSD, and Leap-Tx, Eisai. Peter R. Galle is receiving honoraria from Adaptimmune, Bayer, BMS, AstraZeneca, Sirtex, MSD, Eisai, Ipsen, Roche, Lilly, and Guerbet. Arndt Vogel has received consulting fees and honoraria from AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Eisai, Incyte, Ipsen, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Roche, and Sanofi. Tim Meyer reports consulting fees from Ipsen, AstraZeneca, Roche, Bayer Healthcare, Adaptimmune, Boston Scientific, and Eisai. Lewis R. Roberts has received grant funding from Bayer, BTG International, Exact Sciences, Gilead Sciences, GlycoTest, Redhill, TARGET PharmaSolutions, and FUJIFILM Medical Systems, and has consulted for AstraZeneca, Bayer, Exact Sciences, Gilead Sciences, GRAIL, QED Therapeutics, and TAVEC. Beatriz Mínguez received consultancy fees from Bayer-Shering Pharma and Eisai-Merck, lectures/speaker fees from Eisai, MSD, and Roche, and a research grant from Laboratorios Viñas S.L. Moritz Schmelzle is receiving honoraria from ERBE, Amgen, Merck, and Bayer Healthcare. Max W. Sung is receiving consulting fees from Bayer, EISAI, and Exelixis. Richard S. Finn has received consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer Healthcare, Eisai, CStone, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Merck, Roche/Genenetech, and Exelixis. Augusto Villanueva has received consulting fees from Guidepoint, Fujifilm, Boehringer Ingelheim, FirstWord, and MHLife. Josep M. Llovet is receiving research support from Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Eisai Inc, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Ipsen, and consulting fees from Eli Lilly, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eisai Inc, Celsion Corporation, Exelixis, Merck, Ipsen, Genentech, Roche, Glycotest, Nucleix, Sirtex, Mina Alpha Ltd and AstraZeneca. The remaining authors disclose no conflicts.
Figures
Comment in
-
Have We Found the "Holy Grail" That May Predict Response to Immunotherapy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma?Gastroenterology. 2023 Jan;164(1):15-18. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2022.10.030. Epub 2022 Nov 9. Gastroenterology. 2023. PMID: 36334819 No abstract available.
References
-
- Llovet JM, Kelley RK, Villanueva A, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2021;7:6. - PubMed
-
- Llovet JM, Ricci S, Mazzaferro V, et al. Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2008; 359:378–390. - PubMed
-
- Kudo M, Finn RS, Qin S, et al. Lenvatinib versus sorafenib in first-line treatment of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomised phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet 2018;391:1163–1173. - PubMed
-
- Finn RS, Qin S, Ikeda M, et al. IMbrave150: updated overall survival (OS) data from a global, randomized, open-label phase III study of atezolizumab (atezo) + bevacizumab (bev) versus sorafenib (sor) in patients (pts) with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). J Clin Oncol 2021;39:267.
-
- Finn RS, Qin S, Ikeda M, et al. Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2020;382:1894–1905. - PubMed
