A Comparative Study of Mid-Crestal Incision and Diode Laser Shaped Incision to Assess Papilla Level in Second Stage Dental Implant Surgery
- PMID: 36110672
- PMCID: PMC9469255
- DOI: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_115_22
A Comparative Study of Mid-Crestal Incision and Diode Laser Shaped Incision to Assess Papilla Level in Second Stage Dental Implant Surgery
Abstract
Objectives: To assess papilla level using different techniques in a second stage dental implant surgery.
Materials and methods: Thirty patients who received 45 dental implants were equally divided into 3 groups of 10 each. Group I patients were operated with a scalpel with mid-crestal incision. In group II, dental implants were exposed with a gallium-aluminum-arsenide diode laser. In group III, dental implants were exposed with I shaped incision using a scalpel. Assessment of modified gingival index (mGI), modified plaque index (mPI), and Jemt index were performed at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. The measurement of FAJI, FAJAdj, ST height, and CP Bone crest was performed.
Results: A significant difference in crestal bone level of FAJ- I, FAJ- adj, ST height, and CP Bone crest was recorded at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months among groups I, II, and III (P < 0.05). At 6 months, both groups II and III exhibited >60% of papilla fill as compared to group I.
Conclusion: Diode laser offers maximum papillary fill and resulted in less crestal bone loss as compared to mid-crestal and I shaped incision during a second stage surgery.
Keywords: Dental implant; dental papilla; diode laser.
Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences.
Conflict of interest statement
There are no conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Grossberg DE. Interimplant papilla reconstruction: Assessmentof soft tissue changes and results of 12 consecutive cases. J Periodontol. 2001;72:958–62. - PubMed
-
- Lee DW, Park KH, Moon IS. Dimension of keratinized mucosaand the interproximal papilla between adjacent implants. J Periodontol. 2005;76:1856–60. - PubMed
-
- Nisapakultorn K, Suphanantachat S, Silkosessak O, Rattanamongkolgul S. Factors affecting soft tissue level aroundanterior maxillary single tooth implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;21:662–70. - PubMed
-
- Garber D, Belser U. Restoration-driven implant placement with restoration-generated site development. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 1995;16:796–804. - PubMed
-
- Jemt T. Regeneration of gingival papillae after single implant treatment. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1997;17:326–33. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous