Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Sep 13;35(5):390-395.
doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1746187. eCollection 2022 Sep.

Rectovaginal Fistula Management in Low-Resource Settings

Affiliations
Review

Rectovaginal Fistula Management in Low-Resource Settings

Alisha Lussiez et al. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. .

Abstract

Rectovaginal fistula (RVF) is an abnormal connection between the rectum and vagina that affects women globally. In low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), RVF is most commonly due to obstetric complications such as prolonged labor or perineal tears, female genital mutilation and trauma such as sexual violence or iatrogenic surgical injuries. Women affected by this condition suffer from debilitating physical symptoms, social isolation, economic disempowerment, psychological trauma, low self-esteem, and loss of role fulfillment. Lack of accessible, high-quality, and effective healthcare is a major barrier to timely and safe obstetric care and to care for subsequent complications such as RVF. Additionally, social, cultural, financial, and systemic barriers put women at risk of acquiring fistula and contribute to delays in seeking and receiving care. Literature evaluating RVF repair in those able to access care offers limited information about management and outcomes. It is difficult to ascertain which surgical techniques are used. To reduce the burden of this often-preventable disease, appropriate investment in healthcare infrastructure to strengthen maternal care in LMICs is paramount. Furthermore, more standardized reporting of severity and treatment approach along with outcome data are critical to improving the quality of care for patients impacted by RVF.

Keywords: maternal care; obstetric complications; rectovaginal fistula.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
( A ) Small rectovaginal fistula secondary to obstetric injury with intact perineum and anal sphincters. Printed with permission from Dr. Ann Lowry. ( B ) Large, complex fistula with anterior sphincter disruption and loss of perineal tissue secondary to obstetric injury. The white arrow depicts vaginal fistula opening. Printed with permission from Dr. Andrew Browning.

References

    1. Muleta M, Rasmussen S, Kiserud T. Obstetric fistula in 14,928 Ethiopian women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010;89(07):945–951. - PubMed
    1. Kelly J, Kwast B E. Epidemiologic study of vesicovaginal fistulas in Ethiopia. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 1993;4(05):278–281.
    1. Tebeu P M, Fomulu J N, Khaddaj S, de Bernis L, Delvaux T, Rochat C H. Risk factors for obstetric fistula: a clinical review. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2012;23(04):387–394. - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization Fistula O.Published Accessed February 28, 20222018https://www.who.int/news-room/facts-in-pictures/detail/10-facts-on-obste...
    1. Browning A, Whiteside S. Characteristics, management, and outcomes of repair of rectovaginal fistula among 1100 consecutive cases of female genital tract fistula in Ethiopia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015;131(01):70–73. - PubMed