Isolated ACL Reconstruction Versus ACL Reconstruction Combined With Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis: A Comparative Study of Clinical Outcomes in Adolescent Patients
- PMID: 36113005
- DOI: 10.1177/03635465221118377
Isolated ACL Reconstruction Versus ACL Reconstruction Combined With Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis: A Comparative Study of Clinical Outcomes in Adolescent Patients
Erratum in
-
Corrigendum to "Isolated ACL Reconstruction Versus ACL Reconstruction Combined With Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis: A Comparative Study of Clinical Outcomes in Adolescent Patients".Am J Sports Med. 2022 Dec;50(14):NP66. doi: 10.1177/03635465221137549. Epub 2022 Oct 31. Am J Sports Med. 2022. PMID: 36316297 No abstract available.
Abstract
Background: Young patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) are at a particularly high risk of graft ruptures compared with adults. Recent studies have demonstrated significant reductions in ACL graft rupture rates in high-risk adult populations when a lateral extra-articular procedure is performed, but comparative studies in pediatric and adolescent populations are currently lacking in the literature.
Purpose/hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of isolated ACLR versus combined ACLR and lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) when using the Arnold-Coker modification of the MacIntosh procedure in early adolescent patients. The hypothesis was that combined procedures would be associated with a significantly reduced risk of graft ruptures.
Study design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
Methods: A retrospective analysis of consecutive early adolescent patients who underwent ACLR using a hamstring tendon autograft with or without the Arnold-Coker modification of the MacIntosh procedure was conducted. Patients with ≥1 additional risk factors for a graft rupture were offered LET in addition to ACLR (pivot-shift grade 2 or 3, high level of sporting activity defined as Tegner activity score ≥7, participation in pivoting sports, and Segond fractures). Clinical outcomes including graft rupture rates, patient-reported outcome measure scores (Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score and subjective International Knee Documentation Committee), knee stability, return-to-sports rates, reoperation rates, and complications were assessed. Comparisons between variables were assessed with the chi-square or Fisher exact test for categorical variables and the Student or Wilcoxon test for quantitative variables. Multivariate analyses were undertaken to evaluate risk factors for a graft rupture.
Results: A total of 111 patients with a mean follow-up of 43.8 ± 17.6 months (range, 24-89 months) were included in the study; 40 patients underwent isolated ACLR, and 71 underwent ACLR + LET. The addition of LET to ACLR was associated with a significantly lower graft rupture rate compared with isolated ACLR (0.0% vs 15.0%, respectively; odds ratio, 15.91 [95% CI, 1.81-139.44]; P = .012). It was also associated with significantly better knee stability (pivot-shift grade 3: 0.0% vs 11.4%, respectively; P = .021) (side-to-side anteroposterior laxity difference >5 mm: 0.0% vs 17.1%, respectively; P = .003) and Tegner activity scores (7 vs 6, respectively; P = .010). There were no significant differences between the groups regarding the Patient Acceptable Symptom State for the patient-reported outcome measures, nor for any of the other outcome measures evaluated, and no differences in the rate of non-graft rupture related reoperations or complications. The ACLR + LET group exceeded the minimal clinically important difference with respect to the Tegner activity scale.
Conclusion: In a retrospective comparative cohort study of adolescents, combined ACLR and LET was associated with a significantly lower graft rupture rate and no difference in non-graft rupture related reoperations or complications compared with isolated ACLR.
Keywords: ACL; anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; graft failure; knee; lateral extra-articular tenodesis; ligaments; pediatric sports medicine.
Similar articles
-
ACL Reconstruction Combined With the Arnold-Coker Modification of the MacIntosh Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis: Long-term Clinical and Radiological Outcomes.Am J Sports Med. 2022 Feb;50(2):404-414. doi: 10.1177/03635465211062609. Epub 2021 Dec 23. Am J Sports Med. 2022. PMID: 34939890
-
Comparison of Primary Repair of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Anterolateral Structures to Reconstruction and Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis at 2-Year Follow-up.Am J Sports Med. 2023 Jul;51(9):2300-2312. doi: 10.1177/03635465231178301. Epub 2023 Jun 22. Am J Sports Med. 2023. PMID: 37350021
-
Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Graft Combined With Modified Lemaire Technique Versus Hamstring Graft Combined With Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction: A Clinical Comparative Matched Study With a Mean Follow-up of 5 Years From The SANTI Study Group.Am J Sports Med. 2022 Feb;50(2):395-403. doi: 10.1177/03635465211061123. Epub 2021 Dec 13. Am J Sports Med. 2022. PMID: 34898285
-
Clinical outcomes of extra-articular tenodesis/anterolateral reconstruction in the ACL injured knee.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Feb;26(2):596-604. doi: 10.1007/s00167-017-4596-5. Epub 2017 Jun 12. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018. PMID: 28608009 Review.
-
Clinical Outcomes of Combined Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis and Intra-articular Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Addressing High-Grade Pivot-Shift Phenomenon.Arthroscopy. 2016 May;32(5):898-905. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.08.038. Epub 2015 Oct 30. Arthroscopy. 2016. PMID: 26524939
Cited by
-
Impact of Lateral Extra-Articular Procedure Augmentation on Rerupture Risk and Tegner Activity Scale Outcomes in Adolescent Anterior Cruciate Ligament: A Matched Comparative Study With a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up.Am J Sports Med. 2024 Mar;52(4):892-901. doi: 10.1177/03635465231223703. Epub 2024 Feb 9. Am J Sports Med. 2024. PMID: 38333967 Free PMC article.
-
Anterolateral augmentation procedures during anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions in skeletally immature patients: Scoping review of surgical techniques and outcomes.J Exp Orthop. 2024 Mar 6;11(1):e12012. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.12012. eCollection 2024 Jan. J Exp Orthop. 2024. PMID: 38455455 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluating the Statistical Fragility of Comparative Studies on Autografts for Pediatric ACL Reconstruction.Orthop J Sports Med. 2025 Feb 6;13(2):23259671241313472. doi: 10.1177/23259671241313472. eCollection 2025 Feb. Orthop J Sports Med. 2025. PMID: 39958698 Free PMC article.
-
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Lateral Extra-Articular Procedures: A Systematic Review.Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Feb 8;61(2):294. doi: 10.3390/medicina61020294. Medicina (Kaunas). 2025. PMID: 40005410 Free PMC article.
-
Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction, Posterolateral Corner Reconstruction, and Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis.Arthrosc Tech. 2024 Oct 10;14(3):103244. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2024.103244. eCollection 2025 Mar. Arthrosc Tech. 2024. PMID: 40207335 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical