Efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of a booster regimen of Ad26.COV2.S vaccine against COVID-19 (ENSEMBLE2): results of a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial
- PMID: 36113538
- PMCID: PMC9639796
- DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00506-0
Efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of a booster regimen of Ad26.COV2.S vaccine against COVID-19 (ENSEMBLE2): results of a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial
Erratum in
-
Correction to Lancet Infect Dis 2022; published online Sept 13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00506-0.Lancet Infect Dis. 2023 Jan;23(1):e1. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00739-3. Epub 2022 Nov 7. Lancet Infect Dis. 2023. PMID: 36356604 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Abstract
Background: Despite the availability of effective vaccines against COVID-19, booster vaccinations are needed to maintain vaccine-induced protection against variant strains and breakthrough infections. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of the Ad26.COV2.S vaccine (Janssen) as primary vaccination plus a booster dose.
Methods: ENSEMBLE2 is a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial including crossover vaccination after emergency authorisation of COVID-19 vaccines. Adults aged at least 18 years without previous COVID-19 vaccination at public and private medical practices and hospitals in Belgium, Brazil, Colombia, France, Germany, the Philippines, South Africa, Spain, the UK, and the USA were randomly assigned 1:1 via a computer algorithm to receive intramuscularly administered Ad26.COV2.S as a primary dose plus a booster dose at 2 months or two placebo injections 2 months apart. The primary endpoint was vaccine efficacy against the first occurrence of molecularly confirmed moderate to severe-critical COVID-19 with onset at least 14 days after booster vaccination, which was assessed in participants who received two doses of vaccine or placebo, were negative for SARS-CoV-2 by PCR at baseline and on serology at baseline and day 71, had no major protocol deviations, and were at risk of COVID-19 (ie, had no PCR-positive result or discontinued the study before day 71). Safety was assessed in all participants; reactogenicity, in terms of solicited local and systemic adverse events, was assessed as a secondary endpoint in a safety subset (approximately 6000 randomly selected participants). The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04614948, and is ongoing.
Findings: Enrolment began on Nov 16, 2020, and the primary analysis data cutoff was June 25, 2021. From 34 571 participants screened, the double-blind phase enrolled 31 300 participants, 14 492 of whom received two doses (7484 in the Ad26.COV2.S group and 7008 in the placebo group) and 11 639 of whom were eligible for inclusion in the assessment of the primary endpoint (6024 in the Ad26.COV2.S group and 5615 in the placebo group). The median (IQR) follow-up post-booster vaccination was 36·0 (15·0-62·0) days. Vaccine efficacy was 75·2% (adjusted 95% CI 54·6-87·3) against moderate to severe-critical COVID-19 (14 cases in the Ad26.COV2.S group and 52 cases in the placebo group). Most cases were due to the variants alpha (B.1.1.7) and mu (B.1.621); endpoints for the primary analysis accrued from Nov 16, 2020, to June 25, 2021, before the global dominance of delta (B.1.617.2) or omicron (B.1.1.529). The booster vaccine exhibited an acceptable safety profile. The overall frequencies of solicited local and systemic adverse events (evaluated in the safety subset, n=6067) were higher among vaccine recipients than placebo recipients after the primary and booster doses. The frequency of solicited adverse events in the Ad26.COV2.S group were similar following the primary and booster vaccinations (local adverse events, 1676 [55·6%] of 3015 vs 896 [57·5%] of 1559, respectively; systemic adverse events, 1764 [58·5%] of 3015 vs 821 [52·7%] of 1559, respectively). Solicited adverse events were transient and mostly grade 1-2 in severity.
Interpretation: A homologous Ad26.COV2.S booster administered 2 months after primary single-dose vaccination in adults had an acceptable safety profile and was efficacious against moderate to severe-critical COVID-19. Studies assessing efficacy against newer variants and with longer follow-up are needed.
Funding: Janssen Research & Development.
Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of interests KH, AV, JS, MLG, JV, TK, GS, HS, JVH, MD, and FS are employees of Johnson & Johnson and hold Johnson & Johnson stock or stock options. FS is a former employee of GlaxoSmithKline and holds shares from the GlaxoSmithKline group of companies as part of past employee remuneration. CT and IVD are employees of Johnson & Johnson. DL is an employee of Johnson & Johnson and Cytel. JR-G is an employee of Johnson & Johnson and holds Johnson & Johnson stock or stock options; he is a former employee of GlaxoSmithKline, holds GlaxoSmithKline stock or stock options, and has received funding grants from GlaxoSmithKline Vaccines. CDS has received funding grants for research from Janssen-Cilag, AbbVie, Apeiron, B.Braun, Cepheid, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Corat Therapeutics, Gilead, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Roche, and ViiV Healthcare; and consulting fees, honoraria, and travel support from AbbVie, Cepheid, Formycon, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Molecular Partners, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Swedish Orphan Biovitrium, Roche, and ViiV Healthcare. SNF has received research grants to his institution from Janssen–Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, Sanofi, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, AstraZeneca, and Valneva (no personal fees); has received consulting fees from Janssen–Johnson & Johnson, GlaxoSmithKline, and CureVac; has received fees to his institution for participation on data safety monitoring boards or advisory boards from AstraZeneca, Medimmune, Sanofi, Pfizer, Seqirus, Sandoz, Merck, and Janssen–Johnson & Johnson; and was chair of two UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) sessions (expenses paid per NICE financial regulations).
Figures




Comment in
-
Time to redefine a primary vaccination series?Lancet Infect Dis. 2022 Dec;22(12):1654-1655. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00576-X. Epub 2022 Sep 13. Lancet Infect Dis. 2022. PMID: 36113536 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention SARS-CoV-2 variant classifications and definitions. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/variants/variant-info.html
-
- WHO WHO target product profiles for COVID-19 vaccines. 2020. https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/who-target-product-profiles-for-...
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Supplementary concepts
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous