Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep 16;30(1):39.
doi: 10.1186/s12998-022-00447-z.

Adherence to spinal imaging guidelines and utilization of lumbar spine diagnostic imaging for low back pain at a Canadian Chiropractic College: a historical clinical cohort study

Ali Smith  1 , Varsha Kumar  2 , Jeffrey Cooley  3 , Carlo Ammendolia  4   5 , Joyce Lee  2 , Sheilah Hogg-Johnson  2   5   6   7 , Silvano Mior  2   5   6
Affiliations

Adherence to spinal imaging guidelines and utilization of lumbar spine diagnostic imaging for low back pain at a Canadian Chiropractic College: a historical clinical cohort study

Ali Smith et al. Chiropr Man Therap. .

Abstract

Background: Diagnostic imaging is useful for assessing low back pain (LBP) when a clinician suspects a specific underlying pathology. Evidence-based imaging guidelines assist clinicians in appropriately determining the need for imaging when assessing LBP. A previous study reported high adherence to three clinical guidelines, with utilization rate of 12.3% in imaging of LBP patients attending a chiropractic teaching clinic. A new imaging guideline for spinal disorders has been published and used in teaching. Thus, the aims of our study were to assess the adherence to the new guideline and X-ray utilization in new episodes of LBP.

Methods: We conducted a historical clinical cohort study using patient electronic health record audits at seven teaching clinics over a period of 20 months. Records of patients who were at least 18 years of age, presented with a new onset of LBP, and consented to data collection were included. Abstracted data included patient demographics, the number and type of red flags, and the decision to image. Rate of guideline adherence (proportion of those not recommended for imaging, given no red flags) and rate of image utilization were descriptively analyzed.

Results: We included 498 patients in this study. At least 81% of included patients had one or more red flags reported. The most commonly reported individual red flag was age ≥ 50 (43.8%) followed by pain at rest (15.7%). In those referred for imaging, age ≥ 50 (93.3%) was the most frequently reported red flag. No red flag(s) were identified in 93 patient records, and none were referred for imaging of their LBP, yielding an adherence rate of 100% (95% CI 96, 100%). A total of 17 of 498 patients were recommended for imaging for their low back pain, resulting in an imaging utilization rate of 3.4% (95% CI 1.8, 5.0%).

Conclusion: The imaging utilization rate was 3.4%, lower than 12.3% previously reported at a chiropractic teaching clinic. None without red flags were referred for imaging, yielding a 100%, adherence rate to current LBP imaging guidelines. Future research should consider currency of guideline, accuracy of red flags and factors influencing clinicians' decision, when assessing imaging adherence rates.

Keywords: Adherence; Chiropractic; Guidelines; Low back pain; Radiographs; Red flags; Utilization rates.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no disclaimers or competing interests to report in the preparation of this manuscript.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Summary of patient records
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Verhagen AP, Downie A, Maher CG, Koes BW. Most red flags for malignancy in low back pain guidelines lack empirical support: a systematic review. Pain. 2017;158(10):1860–1868. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000998. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tsiang JT, Kinzy TG, Thompson N, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of patient-entered red flags for lower back pain. Spine J. 2019;19(2):293–300. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.06.342. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Downie A, Hancock M, Jenkins H, Buchbinder R, Harris I, et al. How common is imaging for low back pain in primary and emergency care? Systematic review and meta-analysis of over 4 million imaging requests across 21 years. Br J Sports Med. 2020;54(11):642–651. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2018-100087. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jenkins HJ, Downie AS, Maher CG, Moloney NA, Magnussen JS, Hancock MJ. Imaging for low back pain: is clinical use consistent with guidelines? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Spine J. 2018;18(12):2266–2277. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.05.004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. French S, Green M, Bhatia R, Peng Y, Hayden J, Hartvigsen J, et al. Imaging use for low back pain by Ontario primary care clinicians: protocol for a mixed methods study—the Back ON study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019;20(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2427-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed