Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2023 Jan;25(1):35-42.
doi: 10.1002/ejhf.2695. Epub 2022 Oct 2.

Characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients with acute heart failure with a supranormal left ventricular ejection fraction

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients with acute heart failure with a supranormal left ventricular ejection fraction

Bart J van Essen et al. Eur J Heart Fail. 2023 Jan.

Abstract

Aim: Recent data suggest that guideline-directed medical therapy of patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) might improve clinical outcomes in patients with HF up to a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 55-65%, whereas patients with higher LVEF do not seem to benefit. Recent data have shown that LVEF may have a U-shaped relation with outcome, with poorer outcome also in patients with supranormal values. This suggests that patients with supranormal LVEF may be a distinctive group of patients.

Methods and results: RELAX-AHF-2 was a multicentre, placebo-controlled trial on the effects of serelaxin on 180-day cardiovascular (CV) mortality and worsening HF at day 5 in patients with acute HF. Echocardiograms were performed at hospital admission in 6128 patients: 155 (2.5%) patients were classified as HF with supranormal ejection fraction (HFsnEF; LVEF >65%), 1440 (23.5%) as HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF; LVEF 50-65%), 1353 (22.1%) as HF with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF; LVEF 41-49%) and 3180 (51.9%) as HFrEF (LVEF <40%). Patients with HFsnEF compared to HFpEF were more often women, had higher prevalence of non-ischaemic HF, had lower levels of natriuretic peptides, were less likely to be treated with beta-blockers and had higher blood urea nitrogen plasma levels. All-cause mortality was not statistically different between groups, although patients with HFsnEF had the highest numerical rate. A declining trend was seen in the proportion of 180-day deaths due to CV causes from HFrEF (290/359, 80.8%) to HFsnEF (14/24, 58.3%). The reverse was observed with death from non-CV causes. No treatment effect of serelaxin was observed in any of the subgroups.

Conclusions: In this study, only 2.5% of patients were classified as HFsnEF. HFsnEF was primarily characterized by female sex, lower natriuretic peptides and a higher risk of non-CV death.

Keywords: Acute heart failure; Clinical outcome; Heart failure with supranormal ejection fraction; Serelaxin.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Multivariable predictors of heart failure with supranormal ejection fraction (HFsnEF) compared with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) patients. Backward stepwise variable selection on multiple imputed (n = 50) datasets, variables with univariable p‐value of <0.10 were included in the multivariable model. BNP, brain natriuretic peptide; BUN, blood urea nitrogen.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Proportion of 180‐day all‐cause, cardiovascular (CV) and non‐CV mortality by heart failure subgroup. The numbers inside the bars reflect the absolute number of events per category. LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction.

References

    1. McDonagh TA, Metra M, Adamo M, Gardner RS, Baumbach A, Böhm M, et al. 2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: developed by the Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). With the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur J Heart Fail. 2022;24:4–131. - PubMed
    1. Lund LH, Claggett B, Liu J, Lam CS, Jhund PS, Rosano GM, et al. Heart failure with mid‐range ejection fraction in CHARM: characteristics, outcomes and effect of candesartan across the entire ejection fraction spectrum. Eur J Heart Fail. 2018;20:1230–9. - PubMed
    1. Pfeffer MA, Claggett B, Assmann SF, Boineau R, Anand IS, Clausell N, et al. Regional variation in patients and outcomes in the Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone Antagonist (TOPCAT) trial. Circulation. 2015;131:34–42. - PubMed
    1. Cleland JGF, Bunting K v, Flather MD, Altman DG, Holmes J, Coats AJS, et al. Beta‐blockers for heart failure with reduced, mid‐range, and preserved ejection fraction: an individual patient‐level analysis of double‐blind randomized trials. Eur Heart J. 2018;39:26–35. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anker SD, Butler J, Filippatos G, Ferreira JP, Bocchi E, Böhm M, et al.; EMPEROR‐Preserved Trial Investigators . Empagliflozin in heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction. N Engl J Med. 2021;385:1451–61. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances