Bucco-palatal implant position and its impact on soft tissue level in the maxillary esthetic zone
- PMID: 36114803
- DOI: 10.1111/clr.13995
Bucco-palatal implant position and its impact on soft tissue level in the maxillary esthetic zone
Abstract
Aim: The term "buccal implant position" is commonly used but lacks a precise definition and missing a reference point. Considering its major impact on peri-implantitis and esthetic failures the purpose of this study was to find a correlation between bucco-palatal implant positioning and the midfacial soft tissue level of implant crowns using newly defined Emergence-points.
Materials and methods: Patients with unilateral single-tooth implant crowns in the region of the central or lateral maxillary incisor were included in this study. Digital intraoral scans were superimposed over a scan of the master cast or the original digital data set and analyzed in a computer planning program. In relation to the corresponding natural tooth, an ideal Emergence-point (EIDEAL -point) was defined from a frontal view. The distance to the real Emergence-point (EREAL -point) of the implant crown was correlated to apical displacement (AD) of peri-implant soft tissue. The distance of the implant shoulder (I-point) to the real Emergence-point (EREAL -point) of the implant crown was also correlated to the AD of peri-implant soft tissue. In cross sections, the horizontal distance between EREAL - and I-point represents the sagittal implant position (SIP), and the vertical distance represents the vertical implant position (VIP).
Results: Seventy-three patients met the inclusion criteria. AD ranged from 0 to 3.5 mm (AD = 0.87 ± 1.01), SIP from 0.2 to 5.1 mm (AD = 2.66 ± 1.64). Statistical analysis showed a significant inverse correlation between AD and SIP (ρ = -.55, p < .001). VIP, the implant inclination, time span since implant insertion, and phenotype revealed no significant correlation to AD.
Conclusion: The more palatal the implant was positioned, the less AD was observed. The position of the implant shoulder should preferably be planned more than 2 mm behind the ideal E-point. This E-point can be used for implant planning as it defines the ideal crown length for prospective planning.
Keywords: buccal malposition; bucco-palatal implant position; dental implant; maxillary esthetic zone; sagittal implant position; soft tissue level.
© 2022 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Buser, D., Martin, W., & Belser, U. C. (2004). Optimizing esthetics for implant restorations in the anterior maxilla: Anatomic and surgical considerations. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 19(Suppl), 43-61.
-
- Canullo, L., Tallarico, M., Radovanovic, S., Delibasic, B., Covani, U., & Rakic, M. (2016). Distinguishing predictive profiles for patient-based risk assessment and diagnostics of plaque induced, surgically and prosthetically triggered peri-implantitis. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 27, 1243-1250.
-
- Clementini, M., Tiravia, L., de Risi, V., Vittorini Orgeas, G., Mannocci, A., & de Sanctis, M. (2015). Dimensional changes after immediate implant placement with or without simultaneous regenerative procedures: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 42, 666-677.
-
- Cosyn, J., Sabzevar, M. M., & DE Bruyn, H. (2012). Predictors of inter-proximal and midfacial recession following single implant treatment in the anterior maxilla: A multivariate analysis. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 39, 895-903.
-
- de Rouck, T., Eghbali, R., Collys, K., de Bruyn, H., & Cosyn, J. (2009). The gingival biotype revisited: Transparency of the periodontal probe through the gingival margin as a method to discriminate thin from thick gingiva. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 36, 428-433.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous