Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar 30;20(1):113-121.
doi: 10.47626/1679-4435-2022-911. eCollection 2022 Jan-Mar.

Factors associated with the death of healthcare workers due to COVID-19 in the state of Amapá, Brazil

Affiliations

Factors associated with the death of healthcare workers due to COVID-19 in the state of Amapá, Brazil

Arthur Arantes Cunha et al. Rev Bras Med Trab. .

Abstract

Introduction: Frontline healthcare workers providing care for COVID-19 are more likely to get infected and die compared with other professionals. Deaths or sick leaves due to COVID-19 can affect the smooth operation of health services in areas with shortage of workers.

Objectives: To analyze factors associated with the death of healthcare workers due to COVID-19 in the state of Amapá, Brazil.

Methods: Analytical cross-sectional study using COVID-19 data from Amapá between March 2020 and January 2021. The association of independent variables (sex, race/color, age group, region of residence, comorbidity) with death was analyzed by logistic regression.

Results: Data from 1,258 workers were analyzed. The majority were women (67.7%; 852/1,258), multiracial (66.9%; 759/1,135), aged between 18 and 64 (98.3%; 1,226/1,247), with no comorbidity (86.6%; 1,090/1,258), from the Macapá metropolitan area (56.7%; 713/1,258). The mortality rate was 1.59%. Factors associated with death were: age group = 65 years (odds ratio = 10.43; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.78-39.11), comorbidity (odds ratio = 4.52; 95%CI = 1.74-11.74), and residence in the Macapá metropolitan area (odds ratio = 4.37; 95%CI = 1.25-15.29).

Conclusions: The recognition of factors that may have caused the death of healthcare workers in Amapá can support the recommendation of protective measures for the most susceptible, such as switching to activities with lower exposure to the virus or teleworking.

Keywords: coronavirus infections; epidemiology; healthcare workers; occupational health; regression analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest: None

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Flowchart of data analyzed in the study on deaths of healthcare workers due to COVID-19 in Amapá, Brazil, March 2020 to January 2021 (n = 1,258).

Similar articles

References

    1. Moscola J, Sembajwe G, Jarrett M, Farber B, Chang T, McGinn T, et al. Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in health care personnel in the New York city area. JAMA. 2020;324(9):893–5. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Guerrero-Torres L, Caro-Vega Y, Crabtree-Ramírez B, Sierra-Madero JG. Clinical characteristics and mortality of healthcare workers with SARS-CoV-2 infection in Mexico City. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;73(1):e199–e205. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ran L, Chen X, Wang Y, Wu W, Zhang L, Tan X. Risk factors of healthcare workers with coronavirus disease 2019: a retrospective cohort study in a designated hospital of Wuhan in China. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;71(16):2218–21. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mutambudzi M, Niedzwiedz C, Macdonald E, Leyland A, Mair F, Anderson J, et al. Occupation and risk of severe COVID-19: prospective cohort study of 120,075 UK Biobank participants. Occup Environ Med. 2020;78(5):307–14. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Teixeira CFS, Soares CM, Souza EA, Lisboa ES, Pinto ICM, Andrade LR, et al. A saúde dos profissionais de saúde no enfrentamento da pandemia de Covid-19. Cienc Saude Colet. 2020;25(9):3465–74. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources