Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep 5:11:2022-1-3.
doi: 10.7573/dic.2022-1-3. eCollection 2022.

The prognostic role of variations in tumour markers (CEA, CA15.3) in patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors

Affiliations

The prognostic role of variations in tumour markers (CEA, CA15.3) in patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors

Federico Sottotetti et al. Drugs Context. .

Abstract

Tumour markers have no established role in the monitoring of the course of metastatic breast cancer during antineoplastic therapy, yet cancer antigen 15.3 (CA15.3) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) are commonly used in clinical practice to aid in the early detection of progression of disease (PD). In our multicentre, prospective, real-life study, we enrolled 142 consecutive patients with advanced breast cancer receiving endocrine therapy in combination with a CDK4/6 inhibitor from January 2017 to October 2020; 75 patients had PD at the time of database closure. We measured serum marker concentrations at regular 4-month intervals together with radiological tumour response assessments and in cases of clinical suspicion of PD. Appropriate descriptive and inferential statistical methods were used to analyse serum marker level trends amongst prespecified subgroups and at specific time points (baseline, best radiologically documented tumour response and first detection of PD) in the subpopulation of patients with PD at the time of database closure. Notably, the median time from treatment initiation to best tumour response was 4.4 months. We evaluated the presence of an association between baseline CA15.3 and CEA levels and prespecified clinical characteristics but found no clinically meaningful correlation. We assessed marker level variations at the time of best radiologically documented disease response and PD: in the subgroup of patients who responded to treatment before progressing, we detected a statistically significant correlation with tumour marker variation between the time of best response and progression; this finding was not confirmed in the subgroup of patients that did not benefit from treatment. In conclusion, serum tumour marker flares can be useful in the early diagnosis of PD but should not be used as the sole factor prompting a change in treatment strategy without radiological confirmation.

Keywords: CDK4/6 inhibitors; breast cancer; tumour markers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure and potential conflicts of interest: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) Potential Conflicts of Interests form for the authors is available for download at: https://www.drugsincontext.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/dic.2022-1-3-COI.pdf

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CA15.3 distribution at different measurement times. The red squares describe the median value of the marker distribution at the different time points while the two whiskers indicate the 25th and 75th percentiles.
Figure 2
Figure 2
CEA markers distribution at different measurement times. The red squares describe the median value of the marker distribution at the different time points while the two whiskers indicate the 25th and 75th percentiles.

References

    1. Cardoso F, Paluch-Shimon S, Senkus E, et al. 5th ESO-ESMO international consensus guidelines for advanced breast cancer (ABC 5) Ann Oncol. 2020;31(12):1623–1649. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.09.010. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Saturni S, Bellini F, Braido F, et al. Randomized controlled trials and real life studies. Approaches and methodologies: a clinical point of view. Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2014;27:129–138. doi: 10.1016/j.pupt.2014.01.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schwartz LH, Litière S, de Vries E, et al. RECIST 1.1 – update and clarification: from the RECIST committee. Eur J Cancer. 2016;62:132–137. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.03.081. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. AIOM. Linee guida: neoplasie della mammella. 2020. [Accessed July 29, 2022]. https://www.aiom.it/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/2021_LG_AIOM_Neoplasie_Ma... .
    1. Schettini F, Giuliano M, Giudici F, et al. Endocrine-based treatments in clinically-relevant subgroups of hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancers. 2021;13(6):1458. doi: 10.3390/cancers13061458. - DOI - PMC - PubMed