Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Sep 14;10(9):E1322-E1327.
doi: 10.1055/a-1897-4835. eCollection 2022 Sep.

Educational interventions to improve ergonomics in gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review

Affiliations
Review

Educational interventions to improve ergonomics in gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review

Michael A Scaffidi et al. Endosc Int Open. .

Abstract

Background and study aims Endoscopists are at high risk of musculoskeletal pain and injuries (MSPI). Recently, ergonomics has emerged as an area of interest to reduce and prevent the incidence of MSPI in endoscopy. The aim of this systematic review was to determine educational interventions using ergonomic strategies that target reduction of endoscopist MSPI from gastrointestinal endoscopy. Methods In December 2020, we conducted a systematic search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Scopus, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for articles published from inception to December 16, 2020. Studies were included if they investigated educational interventions aimed at changing knowledge and/or behaviors related to ergonomics in gastrointestinal endoscopy. After screening and full-text review, we extracted data on study design, participants, type of training, and assessment of primary outcomes. We evaluated study quality with the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MERSQI). Results Of the initial 575 records identified in the search, five met inclusion criteria for qualitative synthesis. We found that most studies (n = 4/5, 80 %) were single-arm interventional studies that were conducted in simulated and/or clinical settings. The most common types of interventions were didactic sessions and/or videos (n = 4/5, 80%). Two (40 %) studies used both standardized assessment studies and formal statistical analyses. The mean MERSQI score was 9.7. Conclusions There is emerging literature demonstrating the effectiveness of interventions to improve ergonomics in gastrointestinal endoscopy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests Dr. Khan has received research grants from AbbVie and Ferring Pharmaceuticals and research funding from Pendopharm. Dr. Grover has received research grants and personal fees from AbbVie and Ferring Pharmaceuticals, personal fees from Takeda, education grants from Janssen, and has equity in Volo Healthcare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Summary of study flow.

References

    1. Yung D E, Banfi T, Ciuti G et al.Musculoskeletal injuries in gastrointestinal endoscopists: A systematic review. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;11:939–947. - PubMed
    1. Shergill A K, McQuaid K R, Rempel D. Ergonomics and GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;70:145–153. - PubMed
    1. Khan R, Scaffidi M A, Satchwell J et al.Impact of a simulation-based ergonomics training curriculum on work-related musculoskeletal injury risk in colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020;92:1070–1.08E6. - PubMed
    1. Kuwabara T, Urabe Y, Hiyama T et al.Prevalence and impact of musculoskeletal pain in Japanese gastrointestinal endoscopists: A controlled study. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17:1488–1493. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ridtitid W, Coté G A, Leung W et al.Prevalence and risk factors for musculoskeletal injuries related to endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:294–3.02E6. - PubMed