Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep 15;10(3):38241.
doi: 10.52965/001c.38241. eCollection 2022.

Vasectomy Regret or Lack Thereof

Danyon J Anderson  1 , Morgan Lucero  1 , Stephen Vining  2 , Charles Daniel  2 , Jamal Hasoon  3 , Omar Viswanath  4 , Alan D Kaye  5 , Ivan Urits  6
Affiliations

Vasectomy Regret or Lack Thereof

Danyon J Anderson et al. Health Psychol Res. .

Abstract

Background: Vasectomy is a procedure that results in permanent yet reversible sterility and remains a great contraceptive option for many. Previous research studies have highlighted frequency of vasectomy utilization, defining characteristics of individuals who opt for this method, various surgical techniques, and the risks and benefits associated with the procedure. What remains to be defined is why or why not individuals may experience post-vasectomy regret and whether the previous characteristics correlate.

Objective: The objective of this review is to synthesize information regarding reasons individuals may regret their vasectomy and seek reversal, what options exist for accomplishing the reversal, and patients' fertility prognosis post-vasovasostomy.

Methods: This review utilized a combination of secondary and tertiary data analysis across a wide scope of academic databases pertaining to the topic of interest.

Results: Typically, most males who have sought a vasectomy are satisfied with their decision, however, approximately 6% of this population seeks reversal. Key factors influencing vasectomy regret include age at the time of vasectomy, parental status, pre- and post-operative relationship status, unresolved physical and psychosexual problems, and development of chronic scrotal pain following the procedure. Few options exist for vasectomy reversal including microsurgical reconstructive vasectomy reversal (VR) and sperm extraction for in vitro fertilization. There is no guarantee that fertility will be restored in any case but a major predictive factor for success is the time interval prior to reversal.

Conclusion: Vasectomy is intended to be a permanent form of contraception; however, a minor chance remains that individuals may experience post-operative regret due to various factors. This warrants proper comprehensive counseling by the patient's provider regarding benefits and risks, procedural outcomes, opportunities for reversal, and fertility prognosis.

Keywords: Contraception; vasectomy; vasectomy regret; vasectomy reversal; vasoepididymostomy; vasovasostomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. 1. Zhang X, Eisenberg ML. Vasectomy utilization in men aged 18–45 declined between 2002 and 2017: Results from the United States National Survey for Family Growth data. Andrology. 2022;10(1):137-142. doi:10.1111/andr.13093 - PubMed
    1. 2. Part 2 Vasectomy - UpToDate.
    1. 3. Brown RA, Magarick RH. PSYCHOLOGIC VOLUNTARILY EFFECTS OF VASECTOMY IN CHILDLESS MEN. - PubMed
    1. 4. Punjani N, Goldstein M. Vasectomy: is the apparent decline real or not? doi:10.1111/andr.13093 - PMC - PubMed
    1. 5. Ostrowski KA, Holt SK, Haynes B, Davies BJ, Fuchs EF, Walsh TJ. Evaluation of Vasectomy Trends in the United States. Urology. 2018;118:76-79. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2018.03.016 - PubMed