Use of new approach methodologies (NAMs) to meet regulatory requirements for the assessment of industrial chemicals and pesticides for effects on human health
- PMID: 36119357
- PMCID: PMC9475191
- DOI: 10.3389/ftox.2022.964553
Use of new approach methodologies (NAMs) to meet regulatory requirements for the assessment of industrial chemicals and pesticides for effects on human health
Abstract
New approach methodologies (NAMs) are increasingly being used for regulatory decision making by agencies worldwide because of their potential to reliably and efficiently produce information that is fit for purpose while reducing animal use. This article summarizes the ability to use NAMs for the assessment of human health effects of industrial chemicals and pesticides within the United States, Canada, and European Union regulatory frameworks. While all regulations include some flexibility to allow for the use of NAMs, the implementation of this flexibility varies across product type and regulatory scheme. This article provides an overview of various agencies' guidelines and strategic plans on the use of NAMs, and specific examples of the successful application of NAMs to meet regulatory requirements. It also summarizes intra- and inter-agency collaborations that strengthen scientific, regulatory, and public confidence in NAMs, thereby fostering their global use as reliable and relevant tools for toxicological evaluations. Ultimately, understanding the current regulatory landscape helps inform the scientific community on the steps needed to further advance timely uptake of approaches that best protect human health and the environment.
Keywords: in silico; in vitro; industrial chemicals; new approach methodologies (NAMs); pesticides; risk assesment; toxicity testing.
Copyright © 2022 Stucki, Barton-Maclaren, Bhuller, Henriquez, Henry, Hirn, Miller-Holt, Nagy, Perron, Ratzlaff, Stedeford and Clippinger.
Conflict of interest statement
Author JH was employed by the company Corteva Agriscience. Authors CH and JM-H were employed by the company JT International SA. Authors EN and TS were employed by the law firm Bergeson & Campbell PC. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
-
- Benfenati E., Carnesecchi E., Roncaglioni A., Baldin R., Ceriani L., Ciacci A., et al. (2020). Maintenance,update and further development of EFSA’s chemical hazards: OpenFoodTox 2.0. EFSA Support 17, 1–36. 10.2903/sp.efsa.2020.EN-1822 - DOI
-
- Benigni R., Laura Battistelli C., Bossa C., Giuliani A., Fioravanzo E., Bassan A., et al. (2019). Evaluation of the applicability of existing (Q)SAR models for predicting the genotoxicity of pesticides and similarity analysis related with genotoxicity of pesticides for facilitating of grouping and read across. EFSA Support. 16, 1–221. 10.2903/sp.efsa.2019.EN-1598 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
