Predictors of Success following Microvascular Replantation Surgery of the Upper Extremity in Adult Patients
- PMID: 36119384
- PMCID: PMC9473795
- DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004501
Predictors of Success following Microvascular Replantation Surgery of the Upper Extremity in Adult Patients
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to ascertain which factors are associated with successful replantation in the upper extremity. Secondarily, the purpose was to determine patient factors that differentiate those patients who undergo initial replantation versus initial amputation.
Methods: Data gathered for this retrospective study were obtained from a custom subset of the 2015-2020 IBM Truven MarketScan Commercial and IBM Truven MarketScan Medicare Supplemental databases. Data were sorted using Current Procedural Terminology codes and International Classification of Disease, Ninth and Tenth Revision, diagnosis codes.
Results: Increasing age was significantly associated with undergoing initial amputation compared with replantation (P < 0.001; 95% CI, 47.146-50.654). Among comorbid conditions, patients with diabetes mellitus type II (2.4% versus 24.3%; P < 0.001), hypertension (11.9% versus 28.0%; P = 0.03), end-stage renal disease (0% versus 10.5%; P = 0.03), and hypertensive chronic kidney disease (0% versus 8.7%; P = 0.04) more commonly underwent an initial amputation procedure. When evaluating the need for secondary procedure after replantation, there was no statistical significance between groups when comparing age, gender, insurance type, general comorbidities, connective tissue disorders, mental health disorders, or geographic location.
Conclusions: In conclusion, this study demonstrates that age and the presence of comorbidities are important factors in the differentiation of which patients undergo initial reimplantation versus initial amputation. Additionally, no specific factors were identified that were associated with secondary procedures after replantation.
Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure: The authors have no financial interest to declare in relation to the content of this article.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Comparison of patient-reported outcomes after traumatic upper extremity amputation: Replantation versus prosthetic rehabilitation.Injury. 2016 Dec;47(12):2783-2788. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.10.004. Epub 2016 Oct 19. Injury. 2016. PMID: 28029356
-
Epidemiology of upper extremity replantation surgery in the United States.J Hand Surg Am. 2011 Nov;36(11):1835-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.08.002. Epub 2011 Oct 5. J Hand Surg Am. 2011. PMID: 21975098
-
Clinical factors associated with replantation after traumatic major upper extremity amputation.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Oct;132(4):911-919. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31829f4a49. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013. PMID: 24076683
-
Low molecular weight heparin for prevention of microvascular occlusion in digital replantation.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Apr 17;4(4):CD009894. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009894.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 32302004 Free PMC article.
-
Upper-extremity self-amputation and replantation: 2 case reports and a review of the literature.J Clin Psychiatry. 1998 Dec;59(12):681-6. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v59n1207. J Clin Psychiatry. 1998. PMID: 9921703 Review.
Cited by
-
Microsurgical Digits Replantation in Resource-Limited Setting: A Retrospective Study.Open Access Emerg Med. 2024 Jan 3;16:1-13. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S443219. eCollection 2024. Open Access Emerg Med. 2024. PMID: 38192570 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Barbato B, Salsac AV. Finger and thumb replantation: from biomechanics to practical surgical applications. Hand Surg Rehabil. 2020;39:77–91. - PubMed
-
- Zhu H, Bao B, Zheng X. A comparison of functional outcomes and therapeutic costs: single-digit replantation versus revision amputation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;141:244e–249e. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources