Diagnostic Efficacy of COVID-19 Rapid Antigen Detection Card in Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2
- PMID: 36119413
- PMCID: PMC9473934
- DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1744237
Diagnostic Efficacy of COVID-19 Rapid Antigen Detection Card in Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2
Abstract
Introduction The rapid surge of severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) cases globally makes it essential for rapid diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (rtRT-PCR) remains as the gold standard to detect COVID-19 cases because of its greater sensitivity and specificity. However, because of its prolonged turnaround time and technical expertise, recommendations have been made to employ the use of rapid diagnostic test for rapid diagnosis and to curb the spread of the disease. Methods This prospective study was performed in a tertiary COVID-19 care hospital located amidst the semi-urban settings. Both nasopharyngeal and throat swabs collected from the COVID 19 suspected study participants were subjected to both COVID 19 rtRT-PCR and rapid antigen testing. Results Of the total 599 samples tested by rtRT-PCR, 310 (52%) were positive and 289 (48%) tested negative for SARS-CoV-2. Of the 599 samples tested by rapid antigen test (RAT), 230 (38%) were positive and 369 (62%) were negative. The overall sensitivity and specificity of our study kit was found to be 74.19 and 100%, respectively. The sensitivity of the RAT greatly overlaps with the viral load which is determined by the cycle threshold (CT) values of SARS-CoV-2, E gene, and RdRp gene. Conclusion RAT yields rapid results within a short-turnaround time and found to be cost effective. Therefore, this test can be adopted in areas with rapid surge in SARS-CoV-2 cases which can help to rapidly identify the positive cases and to implement isolation and infection control measures.
Keywords: SARS-CoV-2; novel corona virus; point of care test; rapid diagnostic test; real-time RT-PCR; sensitivity; specificity.
The Indian Association of Laboratory Physicians. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ).
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
[Evaluation of the Rapid Antigen Detection Kit with the Polymerase Chain Reaction for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Respiratory Samples].Mikrobiyol Bul. 2022 Apr;56(2):263-273. doi: 10.5578/mb.20229806. Mikrobiyol Bul. 2022. PMID: 35477229 Turkish.
-
Comparative Evaluation of Nasopharyngeal and Oropharyngeal Swab Based Rapid SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Detection and Real-Time RT-PCR for Diagnosis of COVID-19 in Tertiary Care Hospital.Cureus. 2021 Jul 31;13(7):e16785. doi: 10.7759/cureus.16785. eCollection 2021 Jul. Cureus. 2021. PMID: 34513392 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic Accuracy of a Rapid SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Test Among People Experiencing Homelessness: A Prospective Cohort and Implementation Study.Infect Dis Ther. 2023 Apr;12(4):1073-1082. doi: 10.1007/s40121-023-00787-0. Epub 2023 Mar 13. Infect Dis Ther. 2023. PMID: 36907951 Free PMC article.
-
Intensive diagnostic management of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in academic settings in Japan: challenge and future.Inflamm Regen. 2020 Oct 12;40:38. doi: 10.1186/s41232-020-00147-2. eCollection 2020. Inflamm Regen. 2020. PMID: 33062076 Free PMC article. Review.
-
On Analyzing Capnogram as a Novel Method for Screening COVID-19: A Review on Assessment Methods for COVID-19.Life (Basel). 2021 Oct 17;11(10):1101. doi: 10.3390/life11101101. Life (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34685472 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of rapid antigen tests for COVID-19 compared to the viral genetic test in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.JBI Evid Synth. 2024 Oct 1;22(10):1939-2002. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-23-00291. JBI Evid Synth. 2024. PMID: 39188132 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Banerjee J, Reddy S G, Darapuneni R C, Bilolikar A K.A comparative study: Results of rapid antigen detection assay and real time RT-PCR for diagnosis of COVID-19 in a tertiary care hospital J Med Sci Res. 20208(S1):33–40.
-
- WHO coronavirus (COVID-19) dashboardAccessed February 14, 2022 at:https://covid19.who.int/
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous