Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug 23:13:946500.
doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.946500. eCollection 2022.

Experiences of patients with poststroke spasticity throughout a botulinum toxin treatment cycle: Results from a prospective ethnographic study

Affiliations

Experiences of patients with poststroke spasticity throughout a botulinum toxin treatment cycle: Results from a prospective ethnographic study

Jorge Jacinto et al. Front Neurol. .

Abstract

This study was conducted to capture the experience of patients with poststroke spasticity (PSS) throughout one botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT-A) treatment cycle. The REBOT study (NCT03995524) was a prospective, observational ethnographic study conducted in France, Italy, the UK, and the USA. It combined a mixed-method ethnography (including semi-structured qualitative interviews within a week of a BoNT-A injection) with completion of a longitudinal quantitative patient-reported outcome questionnaire and sharing of video and images, both reported weekly over a 12-14-week period throughout the BoNT-A treatment cycle. The study recruited 30 adult patients with PSS who were receiving BoNT-A treatment. The most commonly used BoNT-A product was onabotulinumtoxinA (Botox®), which was administered to 21 patients (70%), whereas two patients (6.7%) received abobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport®) and seven patients (23.3%) did not specify the BoNT-A medication that they received. Patients reported a high, continuous burden of PSS, with spasms, sleeping difficulties, stiffness, and pain being the most commonly reported symptoms. In line with an observed waning effect of BoNT-A injections, spasticity symptoms initially were improved at Weeks 4-6 after injection but reemerged after 9-11 weeks. Treatment satisfaction levels decreased over the BoNT-A treatment cycle, as reflected by the worsening of symptoms and the need to self-medicate and consult a physician. The psychological impact of PSS was high. Patients acknowledged the benefits of BoNT-A treatment but wished for more individualized treatment plans with flexible dosing and injection intervals. Additionally, only 10% of patients reported that they had a trusting relationship with their physician and believed that their needs were considered by those managing their PSS. To our knowledge, this was the first ethnographic study in patients with PSS who were treated with BoNT-A. This ethnographic approach to patient surveys complements traditional research methods and allows improved identification of patients' unmet needs by capturing their weekly experience of treatment. The findings of this study confirm previous observations of the diminishing effectiveness of BoNT-A injections between treatment sessions, highlighting the need for agents with a longer duration of action and/or a more flexible treatment pattern that allows for more frequent injections.

Keywords: botulinum toxin; ethnographic study; patient-reported outcomes; poststroke spasticity; semi-structured qualitative study.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Author JJ received consultancy fees from Ipsen. Authors AL and FC-G are employees of Ipsen. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study flowchart. aWeekly completion of all sections of the APP, except the WHODAS 2.0, which was completed monthly. bExcept for two patients who did not receive their second injection by Week 22. APP, application; PRO, patient-reported outcome; W, week.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Changes in symptom burden and disability across a BoNT-A treatment cycle. BoNT-A, botulinum neurotoxin A; SD, standard deviation.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Need for self-medication across a BoNT-A treatment cycle. BoNT-A, botulinum neurotoxin A.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Overall weekly mood and BoNT-A treatment satisfaction. BoNT-A, botulinum neurotoxin A; SD, standard deviation.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Mean EQ-5D-5L score across a BoNT-A treatment cycle. BoNT-A, botulinum neurotoxin A; EQ-5D-5L, 5-level, 5-dimension EuroQol questionnaire; SD, standard deviation.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Mean WHODAS 2.0 questionnaire score across a BoNT-A treatment cycle. BoNT-A, botulinum neurotoxin A; WHODAS 2.0, World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0; SD, standard deviation.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Patient perception of the overall spasticity experience: data from two interviews (stage 1 and stage 3). Each recurring theme was coded using the following format: x;y, in which x = “total number of times a theme was mentioned” and y = “number of interviews in which the theme was mentioned.” For example, the code for stiffness (121;38) was mentioned 121 times across 38 interviews.
Figure 8
Figure 8
BoNT-A injection experience mind map. BoNT-A, botulinum neurotoxin A; QoL, quality of life.

References

    1. The GBD 2016 Lifetime Risk of Stroke Collaborators . Global, regiona and country-specific lifetime risks of stroke, 1990 and 2016. N Engl J Med. (2018) 379:2429–37. 10.1056/NEJMoa1804492 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Johnson CO, Nguyen M, Roth GA, Nichols E, Alam T, Abate D, et al. . Global, regional, and national burden of stroke, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. (2019) 18:439–58. 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30034-1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Feigin VL, Nichols E, Alam T, Bannick MS, Beghi E, Blake N, et al. . Global, regional, and national burden of neurological disorders, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. (2019) 18:459–80. 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30499-X - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pandyan AD, Gregoric M, Barnes MP, Wood D, Wijck FV, Burridge J, et al. . Spasticity: clinical perceptions, neurological realities and meaningful measurement. Disabil Rehabil. (2005) 27:2–6. 10.1080/09638280400014576 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zeng H, Chen J, Guo Y, Tan S. Prevalence and risk factors for spasticity after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Neurol. (2021) 11:616097. 10.3389/fneur.2020.616097 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources