Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar;37(3):1658-1671.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09593-0. Epub 2022 Sep 19.

Training and assessment using the LapSim laparoscopic simulator: a scoping review of validity evidence

Conor Toale  1 , Marie Morris  2 , Dara O Kavanagh  2
Affiliations

Training and assessment using the LapSim laparoscopic simulator: a scoping review of validity evidence

Conor Toale et al. Surg Endosc. 2023 Mar.

Abstract

Introduction: The LapSim (Surgical Science, Sweden) laparoscopic simulator is a high-fidelity virtual reality simulator for use in endoscopic surgical training. This review critiques the current validity evidence for the LapSim laparoscopic simulator, specifically with respect to its potential use as a tool and method of training and assessment in surgery.

Methods: A scoping review of the MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, Cochrane and Web of Science databases was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines (2020)-scoping review extension. Articles were included if they presented validity evidence for the use of the LapSim in operative skill training or assessment, in accordance with Messick's validity framework. European Association of Endoscopic Surgeons (EAES) guidelines (2005) were used to provide recommendations for the use of the LapSim in operative performance training and assessments.

Results: Forty-nine articles were included. An EAES level 2 recommendation was provided with regard to the internal consistency reliability of automated performance metrics in assessing performance. An EAES recommendation of 2 was awarded with respect to the ability of the LapSim to discriminate based on case volume and overall laparoscopic experience (relationships with other variables). Performance assessment metrics on the LapSim correlate with improved performance in the operating room (EAES level of recommendation 1-consequential validity).

Conclusion: The LapSim has accumulated substantial evidence supporting the validity of its use in surgical training and assessment. Future studies should explore the relationship between the achievement of performance benchmarks on the LapSim and subsequent patient outcomes, and interrogate the benefits of implementing virtual reality simulation training and assessment curricula in post-graduate surgical training programmes.

Keywords: Assessment; Competency-based education; Operative performance; Simulation; Surgery; Technical skill; Virtual reality.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Hong M, Rozenblit JW, Hamilton AJ (2021) Simulation-based surgical training systems in laparoscopic surgery: a current review. Virtual Real 25:491–510 - DOI
    1. Toale C, Morris M, Kavanagh D (2021) Perceptions and experiences of simulation-based assessment of technical skill in surgery: a scoping review. Am J Surg 222:723–730 - PubMed - DOI
    1. McDougall EM (2007) Validation of surgical simulators. J Endourol 21:244–247 - PubMed - DOI
    1. Carter FJ, Schijven MP, Aggarwal R, Grantcharov T, Francis NK, Hanna GB, Jakimowicz JJ (2005) Consensus guidelines for validation of virtual reality surgical simulators. Surg Endosc 19:1523–1532 - PubMed - DOI
    1. Fairhurst K, Strickland A, Maddern G (2011) The LapSim virtual reality simulator: promising but not yet proven. Surg Endosc 25:343–355 - PubMed - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources