Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep 20;22(1):162.
doi: 10.1186/s12873-022-00717-2.

Paramedic attitudes towards prehospital spinal care: a cross-sectional survey

Neil McDonald  1   2 , Dean Kriellaars  3 , Rob T Pryce  4
Affiliations

Paramedic attitudes towards prehospital spinal care: a cross-sectional survey

Neil McDonald et al. BMC Emerg Med. .

Abstract

Background: The optimal application of spinal motion restriction (SMR) in the prehospital setting continues to be debated. Few studies have examined how changing guidelines have been received and interpreted by emergency medical services (EMS) personnel. This study surveys paramedics' attitudes, observations, and self-reported practices around the treatment of potential spine injuries in the prehospital setting.

Methods: This was a cross-sectional survey of a North American EMS agency. After development and piloting, the final version of the survey contained four sections covering attitudes towards 1) general practice, 2) specific techniques, 3) assessment protocols, and 4) mechanisms of injury (MOI). Questions used Likert-scale, multiple-choice, yes/no, and free-text responses. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was used to identify latent constructs within responses, and factor scores were analyzed by ordinal logistic regression for associations with demographic characteristics (including qualification level, gender, and years of experience). MOI evaluations were assessed for inter-rater reliability (Fleiss' kappa). Inductive qualitative content analysis, following Elo & Kyngäs (2008), was used to examine free-text responses.

Results: Two hundred twenty responses were received (36% of staff). Raw results indicated that respondents felt that SMR was seen as less important than in the past, that they were treating fewer patients than previously, and that they follow protocol in most situations. The EFA identified two factors: one (Judging MOIs) captured paramedics' estimation that the presented MOI could potentially cause a spine injury, and another (Treatment Value) reflected respondents' composite view of the effectiveness, importance, and applicability of SMR. Respondents with advanced life support (ALS) qualification were more likely to be skeptical of the value of SMR compared to those at the basic life support (BLS) level (OR: 2.40, 95%CI: 1.21-4.76, p = 0.01). Overall, respondents showed fair agreement in the evaluation of MOIs (k = 0.31, 95%CI: 0.09-0.49). Content analysis identified tension expressed by respondents between SMR-as-directed and SMR-as-applied.

Conclusion: Results of this survey show that EMS personnel are skeptical of many elements of SMR but use various strategies to balance protocol adherence with optimizing patient care. While identifying several areas for future research, these findings argue for incorporating provider feedback and judgement into future guideline revision.

Keywords: Emergency medical services; Paramedic; Prehospital; Spinal injuries; Survey.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

    1. Jones Rhodes W, Steinbruner D, Finck L, Flarity K. Community Implementation of a Prehospital Spinal Immobilization Guideline. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2016;20(6):792–797. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2016.1194932. - DOI - PubMed
    1. White CC, Domeier RM, Millin MG. EMS spinal precautions and the use of the long backboard - resource document to the position statement of the National Association of EMS Physicians and the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2014;18(2):306–314. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2014.884197. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Connor D, Greaves I, Porter K, Bloch M. Pre-hospital spinal immobilisation: an initial consensus statement. Emerg Med J. 2013;30(12):1067–1069. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2013-203207. - DOI - PubMed
    1. PHTLS: Prehospital Trauma Life Support. 9th ed. Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2020.
    1. Kornhall DK, Jorgensen JJ, Brommeland T, Hyldmo PK, Asbjornsen H, Dolven T, et al. The Norwegian guidelines for the prehospital management of adult trauma patients with potential spinal injury. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017;25(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s13049-016-0345-x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types