Comparative analysis of visual quality between unilateral implantation of a trifocal intraocular lens and a rotationally asymmetric refractive multifocal intraocular lens
- PMID: 36124189
- PMCID: PMC9453403
- DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2022.09.08
Comparative analysis of visual quality between unilateral implantation of a trifocal intraocular lens and a rotationally asymmetric refractive multifocal intraocular lens
Abstract
Aim: To compare visual quality after unilateral cataract surgery with implantation of trifocal intraocular lens (IOL) and asymmetric refractive multifocal IOL.
Methods: The prospective nonrandom, comparative study consisted of 60 eyes of 60 patients suffering unilateral cataract surgery with implantation of two different IOLs: AT LISA tri 839MP (30 eyes; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Germany) and LS-313 MF30 (30 eyes; Oculentis GmbH, Germany). Visual acuity, refractive outcome, contrast sensitivity, defocus curves, quality of vision, and optical phenomena were evaluated at 3mo postoperatively.
Results: There were no statistical differences between groups in uncorrected distance visual acuity (P=0.13) and uncorrected near visual acuity (P=0.54). In contrast, uncorrected intermediate visual acuity was better in trifocal group compared to the refractive multifocal group (P=0.02). No significant statistical between-group difference was detected in cylinder (P=0.43). Compared to trifocal group, spherical refraction and spherical equivalent in refractive multi focal group were more myopic (P<0.01). Under photopic conditions, no significant statistical differences were found between groups in contrast sensitivity at 3 and 6 cycles per degree (cpd). The refractive multifocal group performed better at 12 and 18 cpd than the trifocal group (P=0.01, P=0.034, respectively). The questionnaires of quality of vision and optical phenomena showed no differences between groups.
Conclusion: Trifocal IOL is superior to refractive multifocal IOL in intermediate visual acuity. Rotationally asymmetric refractive multifocal IOL is more myopic in automated refraction and significantly better for the photopic contrast sensitivity at high frequency.
Keywords: contrast sensitivity; rotationally asymmetric multifocal intraocular lens; trifocal intraocular lens; visual quality.
International Journal of Ophthalmology Press.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Comparative analysis of visual outcomes, reading skills, contrast sensitivity, and patient satisfaction with two models of trifocal diffractive intraocular lenses and an extended range of vision intraocular lens.Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018 Oct;256(10):1913-1922. doi: 10.1007/s00417-018-4052-3. Epub 2018 Jul 6. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018. PMID: 29980919
-
Comparison of a new refractive multifocal intraocular lens with an inferior segmental near add and a diffractive multifocal intraocular lens.Ophthalmology. 2012 Mar;119(3):555-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.08.036. Epub 2012 Jan 3. Ophthalmology. 2012. PMID: 22218147
-
Comparison of the visual and intraocular optical performance of a refractive multifocal IOL with rotational asymmetry and an apodized diffractive multifocal IOL.J Refract Surg. 2012 Feb;28(2):100-5. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20120110-01. Epub 2012 Jan 17. J Refract Surg. 2012. PMID: 22263653
-
Comparison of postoperative visual performance between bifocal and trifocal intraocular Lens based on randomized controlled trails: a meta-analysis.BMC Ophthalmol. 2019 Mar 14;19(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12886-019-1078-1. BMC Ophthalmol. 2019. PMID: 30871503 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of trifocal or hybrid multifocal-extended depth of focus intraocular lenses: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 23;11(1):6699. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86222-1. Sci Rep. 2021. PMID: 33758333 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Surgical outcome comparisons of multifocal IOLs of Lentis Comfort LS-313 MF15 and Tecnis Eyhance DIB00V.Int J Ophthalmol. 2023 Dec 18;16(12):2004-2010. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2023.12.12. eCollection 2023. Int J Ophthalmol. 2023. PMID: 38111926 Free PMC article.
-
Effectivity and safety of trifocal intraocular lenses and capsular tension rings implantation for cataract patients with axial high myopia.Int J Ophthalmol. 2024 Mar 18;17(3):499-508. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2024.03.12. eCollection 2024. Int J Ophthalmol. 2024. PMID: 38721516 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of the chromaticity of stimuli on night vision disturbances.Sci Rep. 2024 May 3;14(1):10183. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-61069-4. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 38702452 Free PMC article.
-
A Retrospective Comparative Performance Analysis of Multifocal Eyecryl Actv IOL and the World's First Progressive Polyfocal Autofocus Pro IOL.Clin Ophthalmol. 2025 Apr 28;19:1387-1399. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S521607. eCollection 2025. Clin Ophthalmol. 2025. PMID: 40321165 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Holden BA, Fricke TR, Ho SM, Wong R, Schlenther G, Cronjé S, Burnett A, Papas E, Naidoo KS, Frick KD. Global vision impairment due to uncorrected presbyopia. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126(12):1731–1739. - PubMed
-
- Wolffsohn JS, Davies LN. Presbyopia: effectiveness of correction strategies. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2019;68:124–143. - PubMed
-
- Fricke TR, Tahhan N, Resnikoff S, Papas E, Burnett A, Ho SM, Naduvilath T, Naidoo KS. Global prevalence of presbyopia and vision impairment from uncorrected presbyopia. Ophthalmology. 2018;125(10):1492–1499. - PubMed
-
- Bilbao-Calabuig R, Gónzalez-López F, Llovet-Rausell A, Ortega-Usobiaga J, Tejerina Fernández V, Llovet-Osuna F. Lens-based surgical correction of presbyopia. Where are we in 2020? Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol (Engl Ed) 2021;96(2):74–88. - PubMed
-
- Alió JL, Pikkel J. Multifocal intraocular lenses: neuroadaptation. Essentials in Ophthalmology. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2019. pp. 53–60.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources