Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Feb 16;25(2):270-276.
doi: 10.1093/europace/euac158.

Risk of ionizing radiation in pregnancy: just a myth or a real concern?

Majdi Saada  1 , Erick Sanchez-Jimenez  1 , Ariel Roguin  1
Affiliations
Review

Risk of ionizing radiation in pregnancy: just a myth or a real concern?

Majdi Saada et al. Europace. .

Abstract

There are natural concerns regarding the risks posed to the foetus by ionizing radiation exposure during pregnancy. Therefore, many female physicians select to avoid working in an environment associated with ionizing radiation exposure like the catheterization laboratory and even exclude training as electrophysiology, interventional cardiologists, or radiologists. For those already working in this field, pregnancy involves usually a 1-year interruption (pregnancy and maternity leave) to their careers, leading at times to delays in the decision to become pregnant. This review describes the low added risk of malformation/cancer in the offspring, highlight gaps in our understanding, discuss several common wrong beliefs, and recommend how to further decrease radiation dose, especially during pregnancy.

Keywords: Angiography; Cardiology; Pregnancy; Radiation hazards; Women.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Comparison between medical and natural doses of radiation.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Application of the principles of radiological protection to pregnancy.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Capranzano P, Kunadian V, Mauri J, Petronio AS, Salvatella N, Appelman Y et al. Motivations for and barriers to choosing an interventional cardiology career path: results from the EAPCI Women Committee worldwide survey. EuroIntervention 2016;12:53–59. - PubMed
    1. Ghatan CE, Fassiotto M, Jacobsen JP, Sze DY, Kothary N. Occupational radiation exposure during pregnancy: a survey of attitudes and practices among interventional radiologists. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2016;27:1013–20.e3. - PubMed
    1. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements . NCRP Report 174: Preconception and prenatal radiation exposure: Health effects and protective guidance. NCRP Publications 2013.
    1. Wang TY, Grines C, Ortega R, Dai D, Jacobs AK, Skelding KA et al. Women in interventional cardiology: Update in percutaneous coronary intervention practice patterns and outcomes of female operators from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry®. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2016;87:663–8. - PubMed
    1. International Commission on Radiological Protection . The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 103 Ann 2007; 2–4. - PubMed