Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2022 Sep 20;328(11):1053-1062.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.15459.

Effect of Tocilizumab on Disease Activity in Patients With Active Polymyalgia Rheumatica Receiving Glucocorticoid Therapy: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effect of Tocilizumab on Disease Activity in Patients With Active Polymyalgia Rheumatica Receiving Glucocorticoid Therapy: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Valérie Devauchelle-Pensec et al. JAMA. .

Abstract

Importance: Few treatments are available for patients with glucocorticoid-dependent polymyalgia rheumatica. IL-6 antagonists may reduce disease activity in patients with active glucocorticoid-dependent polymyalgia rheumatica.

Objective: To compare the efficacy of tocilizumab vs placebo in patients with glucocorticoid-dependent polymyalgia rheumatica.

Design, setting, and participants: This double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial enrolled 101 patients with polymyalgia rheumatica at 17 hospitals in France from February 2017 to October 2019. Final follow-up occurred in November 2020. Inclusion criteria were persistent disease activity (polymyalgia rheumatica activity score computed using the C-reactive protein level [CRP PMR-AS] >10) and prednisone dose greater than or equal to 10 mg per day.

Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned to receive intravenous tocilizumab (8 mg/kg; n = 51) or placebo (n = 50) every 4 weeks for 24 weeks, combined with predefined standardized tapering of oral prednisone.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary efficacy end point was CRP PMR-AS less than 10 (range, 0-100; higher values indicate greater activity; no minimal clinically important difference defined) combined with either prednisone dose less than or equal to 5 mg per day or a decrease in prednisone dose greater than or equal to 10 mg from baseline at week 24. There were 11 secondary outcomes assessed at week 24 included in this report, including disease activity (measured by CRP PMR-AS) and the proportion of patients no longer taking prednisone.

Results: Of the 101 randomized patients (mean age, 67.2 years; 68 [67.3%] women), 100 (99%) received at least 1 infusion and 100 completed the trial. The primary end point was achieved in 67.3% of patients in the tocilizumab group and 31.4% of patients in the placebo group (adjusted difference, 36.0% [95% CI, 19.4%-52.6%]; adjusted relative risk, 2.3 [95% CI, 1.5-3.6]; P < .001). Of 11 reported secondary end points at 24 weeks, 7 showed significant differences favoring tocilizumab, including mean CRP PMR-AS score (7.5 [95% CI, 5.4-9.6] vs 14.9 [95% CI, 11.4-18.4]; adjusted difference, -7.5 [95% CI, -11.2 to -3.8]; P < .001) and the percentage of patients no longer receiving prednisone (49.0% vs 19.6%; adjusted difference, 29.3% [95% CI, 18.9%-39.7%]; adjusted relative risk, 2.5 [95% CI, 1.8-3.5]; P < .001). The most frequent adverse events were infections, experienced by 23 patients (46.9%) in the tocilizumab group and 20 (39.2%) in the placebo group.

Conclusions and relevance: Among patients with active polymyalgia rheumatica despite prednisone therapy, tocilizumab, compared with placebo, resulted in a significantly greater percentage of patients with a CRP PMR-AS less than 10 with reduced prednisone requirements at week 24. Further research is needed to confirm efficacy and to determine the balance of potential benefits and harms.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02908217.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Devauchelle-Pensec reported receiving personal fees from Chugai Pharmaceutical and AbbVie and grants and personal fees from Novartis during the conduct of the study and personal fees from Galapagos, Pfizer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, and AbbVie outside the submitted work. Dr Carvajal Alegria reported receiving personal fees from Chugai Pharmaceutical outside the submitted work. Dr Dernis reported receiving personal fees from Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, UCB, AbbVie, Nordic Pharma, Amgen, and Janssen outside the submitted work. Dr Richez reported receiving personal fees from Sanofi, personal fees from Lilly, and personal fees from Novartis outside the submitted work. Dr Wendling reported personal fees from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, Pfizer, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Amgen, Nordic Pharma, UCB, Novartis, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Grunenthal, and Galapagos outside the submitted work. Dr Gottenberg reported receiving personal fees from Roche-Chugai Pharmaceutical, Sanofi, Pfizer, Eli Lilly, Gilead, and Abbvie and grants from Bristol Myers Squibb outside the submitted work. Dr Fautrel reported receiving personal fees from Roche Chugai Pharmaceutical during the conduct of the study. Dr Direz reported receiving personal fees from Novartis and personal fees from Roche-Chugai Pharmaceutical outside the submitted work. Dr Nowak reported receiving grants from the French National Program for Clinical Research and nonfinancial support from Roche-Chugai Pharmaceutical, which donated the infusion form of tocilizumab during the conduct of the study. Dr Saraux reported receiving grants from Roche-Chugai Pharmaceutical and grants from the French National Program for Clinical Research during the conduct of the study and personal fees from Nordic Galapagos, AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Nordic, and Roche-Chugai and grants from Eli Lilly outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Flow of Patients in a Trial of Tocilizumab vs Placebo in Polymyalgia Rheumatica
aRandomization was stratified by hospital and baseline polymyalgia rheumatica activity score calculated using the C-reactive protein level (CRP PMR-AS) (>17 or ≤17). The CRP PMR-AS is the algebraic sum of morning stiffness in minutes multiplied by 0.1, ability to elevate the upper limbs on a scale of 0 to 3, physician's global assessment on a 10-point visual analog scale (VAS), patient-assessed pain intensity on a 10-point VAS, and CRP level in mg/dL. bThe patients in the tocilizumab group with missing outcomes due to not undergoing the week 24 assessment were classified as having failed the study treatment. cAt week 24, a total of 42 patients in the tocilizumab group and 45 in the placebo group had received all 6 infusions; in the remaining patients, the numbers of infusions were 5 for 5 tocilizumab patients and 1 placebo patient, 4 for 1 tocilizumab patient and 3 placebo patients, 3 for no tocilizumab patients and 2 placebo patients, and 2 for 1 tocilizumab patient and no placebo patients.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Disease Activity and Prednisone Dosing From Baseline to Week 24 in a Trial of Tocilizumab vs Placebo in Polymyalgia Rheumatica
The horizonal lines indicate the median value (equal to the lowest quartile if not visible), the squares indicate the mean, edges of boxes indicate the IQR, the ends of the whiskers indicate the highest and lowest values within 1.5 times the IQR beyond the upper and lower quartiles, and the dots indicate more extreme data. A, The CRP PMR-AS is the algebraic sum of morning stiffness in minutes multiplied by 0.1, ability to elevate the upper limbs on a scale of 0 to 3, physician's global assessment on a 10-point visual analog scale (VAS), patient-assessed pain intensity on a 10-point VAS, and C-reactive protein level in mg/dL. Low disease activity is defined as CRP PMR-AS <7; high disease activity, CRP PMR-AS >17; and remission, CRP PMR-AS <1.5. CRP PMR-AS ≥10 indicates a need for treatment escalation. Patients were included if their CRP PMR-AS was >10 as soon as prednisone was decreased below 10 mg/d.

Comment in

References

    1. Buttgereit F, Dejaco C, Matteson EL, Dasgupta B. Polymyalgia rheumatica and giant cell arteritis: a systematic review. JAMA. 2016;315(22):2442-2458. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.5444 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dejaco C, Singh YP, Perel P, et al. ; European League Against Rheumatism; American College of Rheumatology . 2015 Recommendations for the management of polymyalgia rheumatica: a European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology collaborative initiative. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015;74(10):1799-1807. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-207492 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kremers HM, Reinalda MS, Crowson CS, Zinsmeister AR, Hunder GG, Gabriel SE. Relapse in a population based cohort of patients with polymyalgia rheumatica. J Rheumatol. 2005;32(1):65-73. - PubMed
    1. Salvarani C, Cantini F, Niccoli L, et al. Acute-phase reactants and the risk of relapse/recurrence in polymyalgia rheumatica: a prospective followup study. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;53(1):33-38. doi: 10.1002/art.20901 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Caporali R, Cimmino MA, Ferraccioli G, et al. ; Systemic Vasculitis Study Group of the Italian Society for Rheumatology . Prednisone plus methotrexate for polymyalgia rheumatica: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141(7):493-500. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-141-7-200410050-00005 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data