Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep 20;12(9):e062007.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062007.

Is the analogue cognitive test from the ISPOCD equivalent to the digital cognitive test Mindmore? A protocol for a randomised cross-over study including qualitative interviews with self-reported healthy seniors

Affiliations

Is the analogue cognitive test from the ISPOCD equivalent to the digital cognitive test Mindmore? A protocol for a randomised cross-over study including qualitative interviews with self-reported healthy seniors

Anahita Amirpour et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: Postoperative cognitive decline affects cognitive domains such as executive functions, memory, concentration and information processing. The analogue neuropsychological test developed by the International Study Group of Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction (ISPOCD) is a well-established test for assessing cognitive performance. However, analogue tests are time-consuming, rarely cost-effective and can be at risk of administration bias. Digital solutions are comparable to analogue ones, have higher degrees of compliance and enable more standardised execution than analogue tests. Currently, there is a lack of recommendations for clinical evaluation of the patient's cognition in the perioperative setting, standard care usually means no cognitive assessments prior or after the surgery. There is a need to find an equivalent neuropsychological test to the ISPOCD to make it accessible and easier to implement in a clinical context for perioperative patients. This study aims to examine how healthy seniors perform on two neuropsychological tests, analogue versus digital and measure equivalency between tests with correlation analysis.

Methods and analysis: This study will use a randomised cross-over design, including qualitative interviews regarding test experiences. Healthy participants ≥60 years of age will be eligible to participate in the study. Cognitive function will be measured by using the ISPOCD test and the Mindmore digital test. The participants will self-report depressive symptoms with the Geriatric Depression Scale-15, user experience of the digital test using a modified version of the System Usability Scale and answer questionnaires targeting their experiences after the tests. Furthermore, according to the Swedish Quality of Recovery Scale, self-reported concentration difficulties will also be measured.

Ethics and dissemination: The study has been approved by the Swedish Ethical Review Authority (Dnr 2021-05486-01) and will follow the principles outlined in the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments. Results from this study will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals, at scientific conferences, and in social media.

Trial registration number: 2021-01095; ClinicalTrials.gov.

Keywords: Adult anaesthesia; Delirium & cognitive disorders; Geriatric medicine; Qualitative research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

References

    1. Raja M, Bjerkan J, Kymre IG, et al. . Telehealth and digital developments in society that persons 75 years and older in European countries have been part of: a scoping review. BMC Health Serv Res 2021;21:1157. 10.1186/s12913-021-07154-0 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mahanna-Gabrielli E, Schenning KJ, Eriksson LI, et al. . State of the clinical science of perioperative brain health: report from the American Society of Anesthesiologists brain health Initiative Summit 2018. Br J Anaesth 2019;123:464–78. 10.1016/j.bja.2019.07.004 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nilsson U, Gruen R, Myles PS. Postoperative recovery: the importance of the team. Anaesthesia 2020;75:e158–64. 10.1111/anae.14869 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nilsson U, Jaensson M, Hugelius K, et al. . A journey to a new stable state—further development of the postoperative recovery concept from day surgical perspective: a qualitative study. BMJ Open 2020;10:e037755. 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037755 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Peden CJ, Miller TR, Deiner SG, et al. . Improving perioperative brain health: an expert consensus review of key actions for the perioperative care team. Br J Anaesth 2021;126:423–32. 10.1016/j.bja.2020.10.037 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types