Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2023 Jan;38(1):203-207.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07781-1. Epub 2022 Sep 20.

Directly Observed Care: Crossing the Chasm of Quality Measurement

Affiliations
Editorial

Directly Observed Care: Crossing the Chasm of Quality Measurement

A Taylor Kelley et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Jan.

Abstract

After more than two decades of national attention to quality improvement in US healthcare, significant gaps in quality remain. A fundamental problem is that current approaches to measure quality are indirect and therefore imprecise, focusing on clinical documentation of care rather than the actual delivery of care. The National Academy of Medicine (NAM) has identified six domains of quality that are essential to address to improve quality: patient-centeredness, equity, timeliness, efficiency, effectiveness, and safety. In this perspective, we describe how directly observed care-a recorded audit of clinical care delivery-may address problems with current quality measurement, providing a more holistic assessment of healthcare delivery. We further show how directly observed care has the potential to improve each NAM domain of quality.

Keywords: directly observed care; healthcare quality; patient-centered care; unannounced standardized patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

SJW is a Principal of the Institute for Practice and Provider Performance Improvement (I3PI), founded to employ unannounced standardized patient assessments as a quality improvement service. There are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Holistic quality measurement throughout the cycle of healthcare delivery.

References

    1. Institute of Medicine (National Academy of Medicine) Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US). Copyright 2001 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.; 2001.
    1. HEDIS Measures and Technical Resources. Washington, D.C.: National Committee on Quality Assurance; 2021 [cited 2021 October 4]; Available from: https://www.ncqa.org/hedis/measures/.
    1. Berdahl CT, Moran GJ, McBride O, et al. Concordance Between Electronic Clinical Documentation and Physicians' Observed Behavior. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(9):e1911390. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.11390. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Weiner SJ, Wang S, Kelly B, et al. How accurate is the medical record? A comparison of the physician's note with a concealed audio recording in unannounced standardized patient encounters. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020;27(5):770–775. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa027. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schwartz A, Peskin S, Spiro A, et al. Impact of Unannounced Standardized Patient Audit and Feedback on Care, Documentation, and Costs: an Experiment and Claims Analysis. J Gen Intern Med. 2021;36(1):27–34. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05965-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types