Midwives' empathy and shared decision making from women's perspective - sensitivity of an assessment to compare quality of care in prenatal and obstetric care
- PMID: 36127645
- PMCID: PMC9487070
- DOI: 10.1186/s12884-022-05041-y
Midwives' empathy and shared decision making from women's perspective - sensitivity of an assessment to compare quality of care in prenatal and obstetric care
Abstract
Background: For quality-oriented evaluation of prenatal and obstetric care, it is important to systematically consider the perspective of the women receiving care in order to comprehensively assess and optimize quality in a woman-centered manner. Empathy and Shared Decision Making (SDM) are essential components of woman-centered midwifery care. The aim of the study was to analyze measurement invariance of the items of the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) and Shared Decision Making-Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) scales depending on the prenatal versus obstetric care setting.
Methods: One hundred fifty women retrospectively assessed aspects of woman-centered midwifery care in both prenatal and obstetric care setting. The birth of the child was a maximum of 12 months ago. A structural equation modelling approach was adopted to separate true effects from response shift (RS) effects depending on care setting. The latter were analyzed in terms of recalibration (changing women's internal measurement standards), Reprioritization (changing associations of items and construct) as well as Reconceptualization (redefining the target construct).
Results: A response shift model was identified for both assessments (pregnancy/birth: CFI = .96/.96; SRMR = .046/.051). At birth, both scales indicated lower quality of care compared with prenatal care (SDM-Q-9-M/CARE-8-M:|d| = 0.190/0.392). Although no reconceptualization is required for the items of both scales, RS effects are evident for individual items. Due to recalibration and reprioritization effects, the true differences in the items are partly underestimated (SDM-Q-9-M/CARE-8-M: 3/2 items) or overestimated (4/2 items).
Conclusion: The structure of the constructs SDM and Empathy, indicating woman-centered midwifery care, are moderated by the care settings. To validly assess midwives' empathy and shared decision making from women's perspective, setting-dependent response shift effects have to be considered. The proven item-specific response effects contribute to a better understanding of construct characteristics in woman-centered care by midwives during pregnancy and childbirth.
Keywords: Empathy; Midwifery care; Response shift; Shared decision making; Structural equation modelling.
© 2022. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Assessment of the quality of woman-centred midwifery care from the mothers' perspective: A structural analysis of cross-sectional survey data.Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2021 Nov;166:8-17. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2021.07.006. Epub 2021 Aug 30. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2021. PMID: 34474989
-
On speaking terms: a Delphi study on shared decision-making in maternity care.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Jul 9;14:223. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-223. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014. PMID: 25008286 Free PMC article.
-
Women's view on shared decision making and autonomy in childbirth: cohort study of Belgian women.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Jul 8;22(1):551. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04890-x. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022. PMID: 35804308 Free PMC article.
-
Humanistic communication in the evaluation of shared decision making: A systematic review.Patient Educ Couns. 2019 Mar;102(3):452-466. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.11.003. Epub 2018 Nov 12. Patient Educ Couns. 2019. PMID: 30458971
-
Midwives' experiences of facilitating informed decision-making - a narrative literature review.Midwifery. 2022 Jun;109:103322. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2022.103322. Epub 2022 Mar 23. Midwifery. 2022. PMID: 35358936 Review.
Cited by
-
Health literate-sensitive shared decision-making in maternity care: needs for support among maternity care professionals in the Netherlands.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Aug 21;23(1):594. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05915-9. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023. PMID: 37605153 Free PMC article.
-
Midwife empathy and its association with the childbirth experience: a cross-sectional study.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Dec 22;22(1):960. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-05309-3. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022. PMID: 36550461 Free PMC article.
-
Birthing positions and mother`s satisfaction with childbirth: a cross-sectional study on the relevance of self determination.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025 Mar;311(3):591-598. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07770-1. Epub 2024 Nov 4. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025. PMID: 39495292 Free PMC article.
-
Combining the Antenatal Risk Questionnaire and the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in Early Pregnancy in Danish Antenatal Care-A Qualitative Descriptive Study.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Apr 8;21(4):454. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21040454. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024. PMID: 38673365 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Ayerle GM, Mattern E. Topics for research by midwives: an analysis of focus groups with pregnant women, mothers and midwives. Zeitschrift für Hebammenwissenschaft. 2017;05:65–73.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous